IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop-11

Ahmed Bashandy <abashandy.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 06 June 2018 16:27 UTC

Return-Path: <abashandy.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF689130F70; Wed, 6 Jun 2018 09:27:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QNd3Q0lL9JhX; Wed, 6 Jun 2018 09:27:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com (mail-wm0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76734130F6C; Wed, 6 Jun 2018 09:27:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id v16-v6so12672877wmh.5; Wed, 06 Jun 2018 09:27:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=gFT3B+WemosgnjgH0E5xyQnPN7wCy98kYiJ0SCJC6vU=; b=qEQghG5tDBus1Y4lg9YKaKg2gwJKOcGVX7O+FdP768n7OWsVzRtdrTZ6IeAK/Wc/IS w/k88aOvb30BsvFli6KvdY0/6G9AtKWB65nTi8DKG9b+EbzrDj4HS2s43z1Q007NBVBv dfGdriR70af0zx/kwB90kMKFnzULFzIyxowbnp0H3WmC7A5UE4sgO5EHJH5rWmOKoKhm RWR01vwhULQ9kP2145Y128/6+Y/PpvxtDmRVqCD+xXAEZDLG4r6/GoxFLs6BKTAH3cT8 lumoyq47ALXhi63b9pXTO3v0uJ3c7KVH8OBgbp1xpwyWcEhz5gUTj7oThz4tEy0qAXHe UmLw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=gFT3B+WemosgnjgH0E5xyQnPN7wCy98kYiJ0SCJC6vU=; b=NOBGCKKwxRS5/vsvi6345eP/wZpysGof+P3HT6c9nqw1xZjnHx05dEZBigRp89GxQZ F0p9m7RMXl7dgU2C14qSHWKVhrHSQczmy59Ax9nHDQ50X74myzAijvqc3t/v8seIKUR5 qGBW7XfBr++3+Fvor0PBsHK1XLsoW6IzjSevPhH/EOAywoKfObOrPhUL8bUgZnplIp4y ZGlaYnL9+edX8dBq9HVP+gPQ5f6rYyhLA9a0ZlmQ48tPlok7Kxe8eI5hjSzbtxuKe2UT XtBYLy3BK/Jd8kDv8ybVTqIqhq/US2FFt6FjboLQ1NdA1AAf5sR648zEhuJj9I3XrI4u n/oQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E0ViWKAGV3L7p9jontfepwVh8iQo/WspHjEkc1K8S5raS3eMrz8 mUrn09mqBujBrL6HbsHPNuA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKKz4WJl1tOruHfwjZnvkyZCvT+lz/hly5FGVmhxa7bGS2XdSYx+K2jTcHNRV4w8ueBqdZNujw==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:256:: with SMTP id 83-v6mr2440825wmc.41.1528302475026; Wed, 06 Jun 2018 09:27:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.33] ([41.238.143.134]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m185-v6sm5786194wma.36.2018.06.06.09.27.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Jun 2018 09:27:54 -0700 (PDT)
To: Tomonori Takeda <tomonori.takeda@ntt.com>, "'rtg-ads@ietf.org'" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>
Cc: "'spring@ietf.org'" <spring@ietf.org>, "'rtg-dir@ietf.org'" <rtg-dir@ietf.org>, "'draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop.all@ietf.org'" <draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop.all@ietf.org>
References: <TYXPR01MB1677C591FBCB0576D82C7726E8680@TYXPR01MB1677.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
From: Ahmed Bashandy <abashandy.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <dae20055-0e11-2082-c753-87d789e0225e@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2018 09:27:52 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <TYXPR01MB1677C591FBCB0576D82C7726E8680@TYXPR01MB1677.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/Uf1Us-kUoI5C0qedX0l-z021qdQ>
Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop-11
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2018 16:28:01 -0000

thanks a lot for the review

I will address your comments in the next few days


Ahmed



On 5/26/18 8:47 AM, Tomonori Takeda wrote:
> I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see ​http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir  
>
> Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft.
>
>   Document: draft-ietf-spring-segm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email