Re: [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir telechat review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-12

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Mon, 05 February 2018 12:02 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E161200FC; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 04:02:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RFgHhlQQfHYu; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 04:02:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr0-x22f.google.com (mail-wr0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C33E01200B9; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 04:02:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id v31so29266256wrc.11; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 04:02:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=XNXmCKq9FFQkqJsOXmnP9GNY0ocjkrRnKAFqtJGNwo8=; b=O/iyxjfrf4DwZ1IGrFpKj0tZXbOXJ9pndtlB9DO7B0SR3WSFXCmXa4g/YyQsKStqQN 5+kmNOT5d9EljvmAAVZ3Vuxyg3DcF738ImtuTx/buCHz0AW9QYvCBChIOJh2NZhCJacC PBVgtpxVt4c5Lam5ye7VRY93bb/YByovWUBG4IlHiEeRBKMYWl/WrP7bEAAKix5Kb1nP VogIJnWTSDviKxInZSxnAiYXvQC+BPf08A2zbb7uNHns+FGcHTUNNaK9idzAgxKGyS/Y mwBFg9SpILt0n7xjz0iJlQvzlW5SZnmazT7cmhCOF283Cc+mewjFZjzve8X628Sgw8sR Bo3w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=XNXmCKq9FFQkqJsOXmnP9GNY0ocjkrRnKAFqtJGNwo8=; b=ssmd2gnhcpGB1Qym38mQBcFLikQy6xnYJyOq6YoMypMaJvyfQT8xqFWUa5pI+KWbtp ycOR7Xa85vjwPNUGtgB6PSJXFbAy3LeK1vm7Kz1rC75XTmLampmXhGDIXujmeqF7tLy9 zcsvaVQ9xC0BucWktyb1LG658oZK3+mg78PyKI4sdm/v+djksWWXVcFY5ZbT8Fy+Zx3p KRDOMIJ+3swJivjUCNAUnFnsKKQ40WguWsehvp5QdwxC9J9NaNl17MiJUdqjZWTjYRZq 6AXnn/CSEnfVMVIFTEDPYnvX2KuFpdALps9dXAYnktF2ttvht3Q26vnqlRRvIWEphVlU yydA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytfzQqoiycFDeAekEWW0uS5fNPrdUw+rDYnK21jkm2v6PMwXtE7w xtsUarqzRqbsSj7RxWqMIags54fK
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225fIVMdQEylFVgmq1bwLZRdy8gCMFYmG2OGuDbgTlkM2iAi83lF4b2Q08BQG2bU3AFMbr6fTg==
X-Received: by 10.223.195.78 with SMTP id e14mr39573396wrg.68.1517832159018; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 04:02:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.126] (host213-123-124-182.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [213.123.124.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h32sm4397121wrf.65.2018.02.05.04.02.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 05 Feb 2018 04:02:38 -0800 (PST)
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, Stewart Bryant <stewart@g3ysx.org.uk>, rtg-dir@ietf.org
Cc: mtgvenue@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process.all@ietf.org
References: <151782868264.5731.15496399706573021777@ietfa.amsl.com> <9ac4f61b-96b9-8b06-a507-9402e15e7bc6@cisco.com>
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <7504f257-3468-cc06-b472-33ce98393377@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 12:02:36 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9ac4f61b-96b9-8b06-a507-9402e15e7bc6@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------4E8A686438914871BA25B677"
Content-Language: en-GB
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/VVm3eZAb464z88xy3QsP23gNTvs>
Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir telechat review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-12
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 12:02:43 -0000


On 05/02/2018 11:37, Eliot Lear wrote:
>> o  It MUST be possible to provision Internet Access to the Facility
>>        and IETF Hotels that allows local attendees to utilize the
>> SB> When I first read this I though you meant local as in those
>> SB> who live in the country, but I think you mean those at the facility.
>> SB> Clarification may be useful.
> I think this becomes clear in the following sentence.

I still think there is scope of ambiguity. What about "physical attendees"?

Stewart