IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir last call review of draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-11

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Tue, 01 March 2022 17:52 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C5073A012A; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 09:52:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=stpeter.im header.b=h0C+VQCm; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=Ja4jWnzV
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4Y45F_rPewms; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 09:52:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 096063A07C0; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 09:52:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B5D75C00EB; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 12:52:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 01 Mar 2022 12:52:38 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stpeter.im; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; bh=cM8wVmghNjzBUN 5XIit294dEsNDi0o3lrizjM1ziN3g=; b=h0C+VQCmr0+eof/nCtTchdgzHpLrEp F9sLWJeDFBNfp/bp9/q1VzFtxI6RJInrQjK9d0VMn8j900gmZtmqrcpkbmVzPhqB hOXvUv35/LjYD5UvKqk/q7KeI6YIHPhmZGuew6iaT349GFBUwJridWX9lABxspHq 8qfgGgqvmp+p3CChXJYy18HG4swsvco/adSBgtV5ou3KlnunPSpRxg9C/JPwaa5A p4G/edJxcwu1WXrHv8TzSS9ma2wwlMLJcOr6orC1cM0LfPRhg97dgHdZZyUVwayJ kb0PfrTf0BtgsFcY4DtfG3ygBGtnLQJsw4Eq4bP2nFJPRmMTRuiO0X2Q==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=cM8wVmghNjzBUN5XIit294dEsNDi0o3lrizjM1ziN 3g=; b=Ja4jWnzVZrvqFfb5r3F+xPrTTMSUizu82oc86UhJL2uQ5q8bcpiOvam51 pQe+AOPcs6hxbjMPIDzzxLg5zSC3MpwpnRSESmBPTCyngiR2Wh48lOVKAJKodJ+n iuqqs2v2FJNZcHxubFLkWeMSFRVo0fbGp8jHMpBWfzQMp/nW9eMxs3T4xi81Gs/J 5s4RIiESCUNmw8ZKpSRR8BWew6O9uuP2POXIInSPHqJWORGgpFsKvooCy8JQZWvE pkG/rnCeDAKNsfWAyTqdfl0GeH/UYO/COFiRq2CxcXmdarGP2Ge7HmIleQYIjC19 isXveq09UGUl4vZehOlTBOWO+cm7A==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:ZV0eYj6u1f_udtiqHGVihBIAFJw5BJTr8gSTFfwoAKffANRShP7x5Q> <xme:ZV0eYo4ApZWTUS4M42lUQdJZ8wLT-3kGDM7ZhiiFrtmsLStvzJKKJXAIEZsIa5gH8 soKcZ5uMf5c3bKspw>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:ZV0eYqcoCZTsxFavd1pN8pu25TRMjdikzr0xwR0re5ljIaDPQCARnEjBcIhmTfv4GNgaA4nmFyvqUHLTb-EGf5dfNrwO-Gu_L_q4V48>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddruddtvddguddtfecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefkffggfgfuvfhfhfgjtgfgsehtjeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefrvght vghrucfurghinhhtqdetnhgurhgvuceoshhtphgvthgvrhesshhtphgvthgvrhdrihhmqe enucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeehtefhvdejvdfhgeetgefhfeeuudefkeetvdfhkeelleeu heefleekkeekieffudenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrih hlfhhrohhmpehsthhpvghtvghrsehsthhpvghtvghrrdhimh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:ZV0eYkLFQ9P5BOQz5ipZVFFpaCV12C8yhQJISg9FHqiqrtSr0aagbg> <xmx:ZV0eYnINMCgZdD7KP7ftRsg8QfhvkFrzAQfaNyT-h_V5dQpLkk0ZDA> <xmx:ZV0eYtzBiApL2D9n2YcVu-SQ-VRan7E2bxjPtasS_y7VyZtixv-eCQ> <xmx:Zl0eYkHnUguZLT_BXeJIS28e4NH5dvcZTsBgTrEd57TlCfpSWlaO3Q>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 12:52:37 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <f7c2b9d8-4395-776b-80ea-1d0dfc00bb7c@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 10:52:33 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.1
Content-Language: en-US
To: Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>, rtg-dir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model.all@ietf.org, iab@iab.org, last-call@ietf.org
References: <164575444392.24459.14871993066473295047@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <164575444392.24459.14871993066473295047@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/XsZ5Tetloj281G6cSTQfvRqBs24>
Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir last call review of draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-11
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 17:52:51 -0000

Hi Stig, thanks for your review.

On 2/24/22 7:00 PM, Stig Venaas via Datatracker wrote:
> Reviewer: Stig Venaas
> Review result: Has Nits
> 
> I have reviewed the document and it is in good shape.
> 
> The document has a few nits found by the idnits tool. The string "RFC" should
> not be included when specifing "obsoletes:" or "updates:". Also the abstract
> mentions that the documents obsoletes or updates documents that are not listed
> by the obsoletes/updates headers.

Hmm, I don't see that...

    Obsoletes: RFC8728 (if approved)
    Updates: RFC7841, RFC8729, RFC8730 (if approved)

and...

    This document obsoletes [RFC8728] by defining version 3 of the RFC
    Editor Model.  This document updates [RFC7841] by defining
    boilerplate text for the Editorial Stream.  This document updates
    [RFC8729] by replacing the RFC Editor role with the RSWG, RSAB, and
    RSCE.  This document updates [RFC8730] by removing the dependency on
    certain policies specified by the IAB and RSE.

> In 3.1.1.4. paragraph 4:
> "participation for those unable to to attend in person."
> Double "to".

It seems that you reviewed -10, not -11 (which is the latest), since 
that exact text is in -10 but not -11.

> I'm wondering whether any of the references should be normative, but it may not
> make sense for this document.

Indeed we concluded that it didn't make sense for this document.

Thanks!

Peter

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email