[RTG-DIR] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpls-seamless-integ-04.txt

Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.qu@huawei.com> Mon, 28 May 2018 20:29 UTC

Return-Path: <yingzhen.qu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ACE112E89E; Mon, 28 May 2018 13:29:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z3sLBd5AuPHL; Mon, 28 May 2018 13:29:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EA8012E88C; Mon, 28 May 2018 13:29:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 805257FFDB41; Mon, 28 May 2018 21:29:34 +0100 (IST)
Received: from SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.208.112.38) by lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.44) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.382.0; Mon, 28 May 2018 21:29:35 +0100
Received: from SJCEML521-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.141]) by SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.203]) with mapi id 14.03.0382.000; Mon, 28 May 2018 13:29:30 -0700
From: Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.qu@huawei.com>
To: "rtg-ads@ietf.org" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>
CC: "rtg-dir@ietf.org" <rtg-dir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpls-seamless-integ@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpls-seamless-integ@ietf.org>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: RtgDir review: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpls-seamless-integ-04.txt
Thread-Index: AQHT9sKUUjljTmjkGE2a/ODl8GyGFA==
Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 20:29:29 +0000
Message-ID: <A2003ABF-C604-4BAF-B931-6B4D64B0E598@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.212.247.111]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A2003ABFC6044BAFB9316B4D64B0E598huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/aozc_IP2OJDBiW3HRyx-nnLYZbs>
Subject: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpls-seamless-integ-04.txt
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 20:29:45 -0000

Hello,

I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see ​http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir>

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpls-seamless-integ-04.txt
Reviewer: Yingzhen Qu
Review Date: 5/28/2018
IETF LC End Date: 4/23/2018
Intended Status: Standards Track

Summary:
      No issues found. This document is ready for publication.

Comments:
The draft is well written and ready-to-go. It has been widely reviewed and discussed over a number of years, and nits/editorial comments were addressed during WG LC.
This draft proposes procedures by which EVPN and PBB-EVPN can be introduced into VPLS and PBB-VPLS networks without requiring any software or hardware upgrades.

Major Issues:
No major issues found.

Minor Issues:
No minor issues found.

Nits:
No nits found.


Thanks,
Yingzhen