IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir telechat review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-12

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Mon, 05 February 2018 12:08 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B745D126DFB; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 04:08:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Brcio09_f-Cm; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 04:08:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69DC11201F2; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 04:08:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4233; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1517832530; x=1519042130; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=7J6B5n7eK4F7eMGu6ieYfzmXFqL0Q+M7rGxAATYErk4=; b=hO8NUNRIY0I6V2e5rZtj/BlJXk7bIgqdps9GAXmlpOQI0knML+iMCxpw 5hA3JdehabWEaQoEc7NZzjS1rPiuVf049Zp5CPlAMTWT7q3fiBHuVlb9C L2d/xP6akhmspYaIBldbtxdDIMhYsEo3ZGFsGWrHjqtoeA/5FMfEsU7Oa Q=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0B8AQCRSHha/xbLJq1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYUnhA2LGI87kXOHbQcDhTsCgx4UAQEBAQEBAQECayiFJAEFI1YQCwQBEyoCAlcGAQwIAQGKMb9ugicmgRyDPoNyggYBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEOD4RqhVQpgwWIOYJlAQSkJYRigjKOXYIeihkmh1qXdoE8NiKBUDMaCBsVgwSDCYFtQY51AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,464,1511827200"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="1819056"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Feb 2018 12:08:45 +0000
Received: from [10.61.161.200] ([10.61.161.200]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w15C8jOM010876; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 12:08:45 GMT
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, Stewart Bryant <stewart@g3ysx.org.uk>, rtg-dir@ietf.org
Cc: mtgvenue@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process.all@ietf.org
References: <151782868264.5731.15496399706573021777@ietfa.amsl.com> <9ac4f61b-96b9-8b06-a507-9402e15e7bc6@cisco.com> <7504f257-3468-cc06-b472-33ce98393377@gmail.com>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <3dc174be-9dae-b1d1-cc50-d4d2162294ba@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 12:08:44 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7504f257-3468-cc06-b472-33ce98393377@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kdGV13WsQ6ng9kiC2oeQEeOtKkf2wbXBT"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/b1Ezq-gZogbhZcZ2RG_VeWV9iok>
Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir telechat review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-12
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 12:08:52 -0000


On 05.02.18 12:02, Stewart Bryant wrote:
>
>
>
> On 05/02/2018 11:37, Eliot Lear wrote:
>>> o  It MUST be possible to provision Internet Access to the Facility
>>>       and IETF Hotels that allows local attendees to utilize the
>>> SB> When I first read this I though you meant local as in those
>>> SB> who live in the country, but I think you mean those at the facility.
>>> SB> Clarification may be useful.
>> I think this becomes clear in the following sentence.
>
> I still think there is scope of ambiguity. What about "physical
> attendees"?
>

"those attending in person:"?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email