[RTG-DIR] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-04

"Russ White" <russ@riw.us> Mon, 10 April 2017 16:30 UTC

Return-Path: <russ@riw.us>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 116A4129562; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.08
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.08 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oqWtYUpkl7Bp; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:30:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DBD2129566; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:30:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E465D20A39; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 12:30:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 10 Apr 2017 12:30:47 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=pPIOmGvi3h3CNmSqo8 6+Cir9qjMN8vBpY9fZcV1Emrw=; b=HI3I8AaniqFK3tEs+fUhgerqW/7y0n+e/6 l9a7Kx5tL5n142gJ9Hu9GFZ3y90QPAqGY04pBEZUgkbDKh34upYaquzGflmhYV4G VIGvevvBdUvWMs1RYR8WApi2JKdi5+TVn229eP+nTDYehF535rJDLcAl8B+uIVQI d9MR8CypNFishjIWO3mYf/WnqJlf8vyDNyfH+dmjX3wtIY4mZpMTyglCZd//t/OB 8g+HklnuJbtIU5u7Qy+V625UQeF/6aD++sikFT/qtE/OJdYL60A306pQGAUNFxvx u8hk+WcT1uBXDHvHDrgpRINnmxo2tG6itjaUMlUBdm89NUK2nc0w==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:N7PrWB1v1oTk5a8twwYo2mBjnxly_juDoMFW5mqeal1S4SpKf0tevg>
X-Sasl-enc: FAP5sK5ZKrc+2iZ+BpdGnvqI23qW2yvzVas+YO361MVS 1491841847
Received: from Russ (108-78-210-25.lightspeed.chrlnc.sbcglobal.net [108.78.210.25]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7249F7E334; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 12:30:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Russ White" <russ@riw.us>
To: <rtg-ads@ietf.org>
Cc: <rtg-dir@ietf.org>, <draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject.all@ietf.org>, <grow@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 12:30:44 -0400
Message-ID: <006601d2b217$cddc3b40$6994b1c0$@riw.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AdKyF7al9Ze3c3FfS0qlnu1Vd/Vu5g==
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/c1GnXLUwz6RziVszKh1YlpgBOdY>
Subject: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-04
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:30:53 -0000

Hello,

I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see ​http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-04
Reviewer: Russ White
Review Date: 10 April 2017
Intended Status: Standards Track

Summary: 

No issues found. This document is ready for publication.

Comments:

The draft is mercifully short and very readable, clearly noting the requirements on implementations and their consequences.

Major Issues:

No major issues found.

Minor Issues:

No minor issues found.

:-) /r