[RTG-DIR] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis-08.txt

Ben Niven-Jenkins <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk> Tue, 12 March 2019 00:08 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01486131251; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 17:08:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.308
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.308 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=1.592, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k-5D1FdpY-Tj; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 17:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailex.mailcore.me (mailex.mailcore.me [94.136.40.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 791CF131278; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 17:08:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 50-201-223-3-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([50.201.223.3] helo=[10.20.6.64]) by smtp03.mailcore.me with esmtpa (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk>) id 1h3Uxy-00016Z-Jn; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 00:08:23 +0000
From: Ben Niven-Jenkins <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.1 \(3445.101.1\))
Message-Id: <19F57D35-A560-489A-97EF-FC290D3E3345@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 19:53:42 +0000
Cc: rtg-dir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis.all@ietf.org
To: "<rtg-ads@ietf.org> (rtg-ads@ietf.org)" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.101.1)
X-Mailcore-Auth: 9600544
X-Mailcore-Domain: 172912
X-KLMS-Rule-ID: 1
X-KLMS-Message-Action: clean
X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Status: not scanned, license restriction
X-KLMS-AntiPhishing: not scanned, license restriction
X-KLMS-AntiVirus: Kaspersky Security 8.0 for Linux Mail Server, version 8.0.1.721, bases: 2019/03/11 14:10:00 #9341355
X-KLMS-AntiVirus-Status: Clean, skipped
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/cYKVMCXtI9FsiObxIx5xUaN20kc>
Subject: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis-08.txt
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 00:08:39 -0000

Hello,

I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis-08.txt
Reviewer: Ben Niven-Jenkins
Review Date: 11th March 2019
IETF LC End Date: 18th March 2019
Intended Status:  
Best Current Practice


Summary: No issues found. This document is ready for publication.

Comments: The document describes the structure of IASA 2.0 and is well written and easy to read.

Major Issues: No major issues found.

Minor Issues: No minor issues found.

Nits: Section 1, Introduction, paragraph 6 uses “IETF Administration LLC Executive Director” when the terminology section (4.1) uses “IETF LLC Executive Director”.

Regards
Ben