[RTG-DIR] Routing Directorate Last Call Review for draft-ietf-grow-bmp-adj-rib-out-05.txt

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Thu, 20 June 2019 17:02 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEBA81200EF; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 10:02:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -13.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_COMMENT_SAVED_URL=1.391, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_HTML_ATTACH=0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=YSME7was; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=yK6DI9lg
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tkTbXI54Tzrc; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 10:02:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C735A120092; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 10:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=109662; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1561050131; x=1562259731; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=3cDKpKpeQJQtIXGPHCMM9KCbB5wOf1Brsd6eBsZ9SoE=; b=YSME7waseKN4l7+VCX3gHwsKrPvabk1Y11xwjl9xfq+M3Mnhq1tzJFp9 Nfdt6fzxGTEtRKW3laZlGuX09vnqQzZUWW+jBGQTtpw06Onnuq6WKyMIn 2wtFzTMHplmeHkVD2whiTPH70XV/vPIOt74iCYD4RiOvD3Lsj2SUhOHKa E=;
X-Files: Diff_ draft-ietf-grow-bmp-adj-rib-out-05.txt.orig - draft-ietf-grow-bmp-adj-rib-out-05.txt.html : 70649
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AqDhO8hWF2md/ZGaTE5qzDyLRZt/V8LGuZFwc94?= =?us-ascii?q?YnhrRSc6+q45XlOgnF6O5wiEPSANiJ8OpK3uzRta2oGXcN55qMqjgjSNRNTF?= =?us-ascii?q?dEwd4TgxRmBceEDUPhK/u/Zic3EexJVURu+DewNk0GUMs=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CMBwAruwtd/5NdJa1bCh0BAQUBBwU?= =?us-ascii?q?BgVYFAQsBgRQvJCwDalUgBAsohBaBX4FoA45hgjSINopHhF+CUgNUAgcBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?MAQElCAIBAYEqAYFegTcZgkcjNwYOAQMBAQQBAQIBBW2KNwyFTRYICQoTAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?lEgERARwkAQkCBDAnBAENEwYOgwABgWoDHQEOm3YCgTiIX3GBMYJ5AQEFhQI?= =?us-ascii?q?YggoHCYE0AYRwhm0XgX+BEScME4IegkCBAgsBAQIBF4EcFTYNgl0ygiaLfyC?= =?us-ascii?q?CJIR4I4ZVhGaJcGoJAoIRgySCSlyCAIJgiDAbgihqhiGJa4QfjSGBLIV7jAJ?= =?us-ascii?q?XgnECBAIEBQIOAQEFgT0pIoFYcBVlAYJBCYIUJINwhRSFP3IBAYEni3oCBCA?= =?us-ascii?q?HgiUBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.63,397,1557187200"; d="html'217?scan'217,208,217";a="576702825"
Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 20 Jun 2019 17:02:08 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-013.cisco.com (xch-aln-013.cisco.com [173.36.7.23]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x5KH28jU014286 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 20 Jun 2019 17:02:08 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by XCH-ALN-013.cisco.com (173.36.7.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 12:02:07 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 13:02:06 -0400
Received: from NAM04-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 12:02:06 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=KW0XRVYtL0i32UfbBh8EdJLyE/6w6G59gSGHLofry9A=; b=yK6DI9lginNiJZUxvoYoGfBLrk855jftLc1YfofiLtYmB+tYCwtjfe+RG0+Ho8ZQKCVuBIlgtY1pq4yP2z9Jbiuhl/e+oQTM/doLb8WoKBaAA+58L0EIZ8EdNYTbdlsR7wvAaz/Uxr61+M+6ZPCVHOHE9egevD4g2G2G65foHlA=
Received: from MWHPR11MB1902.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.175.53.139) by MWHPR11MB0077.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.164.204.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1987.15; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 17:02:05 +0000
Received: from MWHPR11MB1902.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f1d4:41cf:84d6:ff73]) by MWHPR11MB1902.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f1d4:41cf:84d6:ff73%2]) with mapi id 15.20.1987.014; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 17:02:05 +0000
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "draft-ietf-grow-bmp-adj-rib-out@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-grow-bmp-adj-rib-out@ietf.org>, "<rtg-ads@ietf.org> (rtg-ads@ietf.org)" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>
CC: "grow@ietf.org" <grow@ietf.org>, Routing Directorate <rtg-dir@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Routing Directorate Last Call Review for draft-ietf-grow-bmp-adj-rib-out-05.txt
Thread-Index: AQHVJ4njkZFIftGXPk+gzhAhb9+PVA==
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 17:02:05 +0000
Message-ID: <0886B91A-1395-420A-ACCE-011D912632FC@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=acee@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c8:1008::842]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: dda95e65-3f3e-4c73-d6ff-08d6f5a105a6
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(49563074)(7193020); SRVR:MWHPR11MB0077;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MWHPR11MB0077:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 12
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MWHPR11MB0077497B90003D65085552B6C2E40@MWHPR11MB0077.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0074BBE012
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(136003)(39860400002)(366004)(346002)(376002)(396003)(189003)(199004)(236005)(110136005)(6306002)(54896002)(99936001)(33656002)(53936002)(476003)(102836004)(6436002)(6512007)(6116002)(6506007)(316002)(2616005)(25786009)(86362001)(2501003)(6486002)(99286004)(486006)(450100002)(790700001)(508600001)(9326002)(4326008)(5660300002)(186003)(8936002)(606006)(71190400001)(71200400001)(2906002)(46003)(66616009)(66446008)(66556008)(81156014)(64756008)(68736007)(14454004)(66946007)(73956011)(36756003)(66476007)(7736002)(81166006)(54906003)(66574012)(256004)(91956017)(76116006)(8676002)(14444005)(5024004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MWHPR11MB0077; H:MWHPR11MB1902.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: JqoVf6f59xgaUA0PUiuzD6AMkvRN7vjbB2JfqzjB9cqyI15ZIPyErXfhA6425YooZMUgm4ZH6j2k/lYcwyoUDuJKIAzdV9U7wqhDCIRe8pN8TOB62Z8PTGVACTwePUVwgeruAP1aPAy4C6fAU8XtcuF7RhcJxxpisEdKSzjWDzB7bS/JmyQ0fFqz5v1i596pgsIz+u6z/IGsLbv+DYNtw6So/5T1UI6kpNgjfC3UtoMD0zdw4uoLdvT4AKA76vC6gj7EtgyMMLCdRQXvSHV8/VdenvtnkBxsaAWDC1/NULjfQNDZPepGXmhQAn10SMbkZ9vDIBx12q3tdDqk8BPN2RKZfbRO+fdTgt+anP5RRVT2p015EP0SxP3IV977W5NLWmqpKSGjQyEL/jjZGWKtOTZCWk4MPBkLGPebTDgCWPM=
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_004_0886B91A1395420AACCE011D912632FCciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: dda95e65-3f3e-4c73-d6ff-08d6f5a105a6
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 20 Jun 2019 17:02:05.1402 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: acee@cisco.com
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MWHPR11MB0077
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.23, xch-aln-013.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-11.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/cgoXT0_5PlExb7RRN9MFBfe_TaQ>
Subject: [RTG-DIR] Routing Directorate Last Call Review for draft-ietf-grow-bmp-adj-rib-out-05.txt
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 17:02:17 -0000

Hello,

I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see ​http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-grow-bmp-adj-rib-out-05.txt
Reviewer: Acee Lindem
Review Date: June 20, 2018
IETF LC End Date: Not started yet.
Intended Status: Standards Track

Summary: The document extends BGP Monitoring Protocol to support per-peer Pre-Policy and Post-Policy Adj-RIB-Out monitoring similar to RFC 7854 support of Adj-RIB-In. The document is ready for publication.

Comments: A well-written clear and concise document.

Major Issues: N/A

Minor Issues:
    Use updated boilerplate text for “Reserved Words”.

    You will be undoubtedly asked to explain why the Adj-RIB-Out support doesn’t add any additional security considerations. However, I’ll leave that the security reviewers so that they can fulfill their divine mandate of securing the Internet.

Nits: See attached diff including Peer Up and Peer Down capitalization consistent with RFC 7854.

Thanks,
Acee