[RTG-DIR] Rtgdir last call review of draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-11

Stig Venaas via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 25 February 2022 02:00 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 312E53A1038; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 18:00:44 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stig Venaas via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model.all@ietf.org, iab@iab.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.46.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <164575444392.24459.14871993066473295047@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 18:00:44 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/fbYBwN8z9lnWb7Psh26FfAZvP2A>
Subject: [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir last call review of draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-11
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 02:00:45 -0000

Reviewer: Stig Venaas
Review result: Has Nits

I have reviewed the document and it is in good shape.

The document has a few nits found by the idnits tool. The string "RFC" should
not be included when specifing "obsoletes:" or "updates:". Also the abstract
mentions that the documents obsoletes or updates documents that are not listed
by the obsoletes/updates headers.

In 3.1.1.4. paragraph 4:
"participation for those unable to to attend in person."
Double "to".

I'm wondering whether any of the references should be normative, but it may not
make sense for this document.