IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [RTG-DIR] [Sidrops] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-sidrops-rtr-keying-01

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Tue, 18 December 2018 16:37 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9FB9130F4F; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 08:37:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tufSy_afYbHP; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 08:37:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A63C130F24; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 08:37:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1gZIN2-00060V-Ib; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 16:37:24 +0000
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 08:37:23 -0800
Message-ID: <m24lba94fw.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
Cc: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>, rtg-dir@ietf.org, rtg-ads@ietf.org, SIDR Operations WG <sidrops@ietf.org>, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>, draft-ietf-sidrops-rtr-keying.all@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CACWOCC9orM5Ym-0tr+oHc1nszzi5vass3i6w42q7r22K16VHvQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAB75xn7Hs8FMg6_HPiDM22+g=boYVVKotkeB5+oq3FuRbmNzfw@mail.gmail.com> <687EE83A-5A88-4836-99E4-7425FE8FF964@sn3rd.com> <m25zvq94r0.wl-randy@psg.com> <CACWOCC9orM5Ym-0tr+oHc1nszzi5vass3i6w42q7r22K16VHvQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/25.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/ijlINej8G_xaaVJvNzVxV89FNLE>
Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] [Sidrops] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-sidrops-rtr-keying-01
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 16:37:32 -0000

>>> How about:
>>>
>>>    employees that no longer need access to a router SHOULD
>>>    have their access rights removed for that router to ensure only
>>>    those authorized for that router have access.
>>
>> why are we going into ops practice which is not directly relevant?
> 
> I'd just remove the section about employees, this seems to be going a
> bit into the weeds.

was polling other authors

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email