IETF Logo Mail Archive

[RTG-DIR] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-10

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Tue, 20 July 2021 17:31 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A00743A2BC3; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 10:31:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c--76cy3eBNA; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 10:31:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2f.google.com (mail-io1-xd2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DA7C3A2BC9; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 10:31:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2f.google.com with SMTP id p186so24848996iod.13; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 10:31:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PZgRZfWRP0FC8a8R0g28lNfQJfDRlVtPP443y4qy330=; b=c7USF2W+yLiXaW+UQeFF5MM+TyDzo9Mcq3ioV1EsnVy3rF7XRtJnDkpm2nIGS52u/m xClG5kxJw4waHYVvYoa3QSiv+lJoCu6p+wIcpAz5UODixT5EfWCvDeuZH6YTLSXzH9vv lAkCXhXmsoSD+S8XmwFXpNTdWD9PpRfAaU9aIUyCAAaz8lAH0j4adSr810jBgHF8lrJh syieyj3kBym9yUMEu0mpTKAeYCmOoi8ltH1kF6mBpMRfqLc3EqFeuJEebem83Tw22a3C 98+j4QJigtxZdjdhEdB8ZmT6HBon6LfwC+mJ32quWOTkhwbug2XIHun9SAht3e/3ildH wSKg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PZgRZfWRP0FC8a8R0g28lNfQJfDRlVtPP443y4qy330=; b=GJzpWeQGDvSJwsnRAL4MxNc85POOBCHVooC7Vp2pyVTMQFkS3K8wcJErWzYrsYYEW1 +bMWo2GjlaTucGjRJQdO3O91bZic1fzcPaop/Ogq3EWDuC6fnd/3Lfa5BlIoMKDndmM0 Psr5q0CfWxGi3raBBnSIhuEFzKjJD7An1YxjYyqWgFl1JqVGC4j5PoF8KU7UxQOljIv8 QIl9TNJdBphV+DmLb034+KqernHtWJyInxbsMd/Va4XBCH5Kn8Y6S1/roK8q4zsJ6Y1o skSboLh8WKUwt4IHyPBA4YT6eeoc/ZnKR/Oo91pL6Pa69sCjpmUWFxJKgr9IGYIZaXUA ujZQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532sMf4Cv690RrdpjvzQB7J+PrrTJ7UKG/fSD6yqj9bW66sbQA7W aVhp4VnquNIeOQYTkUwW6MskHWk3HZpGJamXKOUmYaV0+dU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx2Jbynf2XkOiYBN7UVkmcY5oLkY1RelPRiy3hZ+Czj+MugHiT01NxJDUd/TE0Z4tI4mWlJTIsyLSRcLYy+B2Y=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:3a1:: with SMTP id z1mr26751143jap.77.1626802274400; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 10:31:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 13:30:58 -0400
Message-ID: <CAA=duU2UZWo+R2=w-hLyHdY7-ob1qBv4BugD5_A++83B+5i5zA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "<rtg-ads@ietf.org>" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>
Cc: Routing Directorate <rtg-dir@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm.all@ietf.org, opsawg@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000af7f1605c7916b6d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/k8nMdTpOnW3ombZzDbgfxAZ2oXY>
Subject: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-10
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 17:31:20 -0000

Hello,

I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft.
The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related
drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes
on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to
the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please
see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it
would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last
Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through
discussion or by updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-10
Reviewer: Andy Malis
Review Date: 2021-07-20
IETF LC End Date: 2021-08-06
Intended Status: Proposed Standard

Summary:

No issues found. This document is ready for publication.

Comments:

This draft has been through 11 revisions and has been twice reviewed by the
Yang Doctors. All of its normative references save one have already been
published, and the one draft normative reference is also in IETF Last Call.
In addition, the very useful Appendix B shows that there are at least four
publicly-announced implementations in various stages of progress. This all
indicates the maturity of this draft as it enters IETF Last Call.

I found the commentary and model overview easy to read, and if I were
writing an implementation, I would certainly appreciate the provisioning
examples in Appendix A.

I also appreciated the comparison to RFC 8299.

Although I'm not a SECDIR reviewer, I found the Security Considerations
section to be substantive.

To conclude, I consider this draft ready for publication.

Regards,
Andy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email