[RTG-DIR] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-6man-ra-pref64-08

Ines Robles via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 11 December 2019 18:54 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 737ED120829; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 10:54:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ines Robles via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
Cc: last-call@ietf.org, draft-ietf-6man-ra-pref64.all@ietf.org, ipv6@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.113.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
Message-ID: <157609045038.11527.1727862630387738006@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 10:54:10 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/pU3hXQHMqo4INibZBV6wY3nGY3c>
Subject: [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-6man-ra-pref64-08
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 18:54:11 -0000

Reviewer: Ines Robles
Review result: Ready

Document: draft-ietf-6man-ra-pref64-08
Reviewer: Ines Robles
Review Date: 2019-12-11

Summary:

I believe the draft is technically good. This document is well written.

This document specifies a Neighbor Discovery option to be used in Router
Advertisements to communicate NAT64 prefixes to hosts. The document mentions
use cases and usage guidelines.

Major issues: Not found

Minor issues: Not found

Nits/editorial comments:  Tool results : Summary: 0 errors (**), 0 flaws (~~),
2 warnings (==), 2 comments (--).

Thank you for this document,

Ines.