[RTG-DIR] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-07
Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com> Mon, 29 April 2019 02:44 UTC
Return-Path: <mach.chen@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E621412027D; Sun, 28 Apr 2019 19:44:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tlHOH4riRjyw; Sun, 28 Apr 2019 19:44:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C65512009A; Sun, 28 Apr 2019 19:44:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 2CA8B32828F9210CFBA2; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 03:44:41 +0100 (IST)
Received: from lhreml705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.54) by lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.48) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 03:44:40 +0100
Received: from lhreml705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.54) by lhreml705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.54) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 03:44:40 +0100
Received: from DGGEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.32) by lhreml705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.54) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA_P256) id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 03:44:40 +0100
Received: from DGGEML530-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.66]) by DGGEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com ([fe80::89ed:853e:30a9:2a79%31]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 10:44:35 +0800
From: Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>
To: Routing ADs <rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org>
CC: Routing Directorate <rtg-dir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability.all@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: RtgDir review: draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-07
Thread-Index: AdT+MO3OYBJks3uTS9C1VyN9IWWn+Q==
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 02:44:34 +0000
Message-ID: <F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE2929EEF62@dggeml530-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.194.201]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/qKMy0p-SEpvTNrbLvdTNpnQPpmM>
Subject: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-07
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 02:44:45 -0000
Hello, I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft. Document: draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-07 Reviewer: Mach Chen Review Date: 04/28/2019 IETF LC End Date: date-if-known Intended Status: Informational Summary: This document is ready for publication. Comments: This document is well-written and easy to read, it gives a comprehensive introduction on how to apply PCE for inter-domain path computation. Best regards, Mach