IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir Early review: draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Wed, 19 July 2017 12:19 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EC53131B27; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 05:19:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.946
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.946 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zVD8mGuXQ10s; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 05:19:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D12B2131B13; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 05:19:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=31.133.141.64;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: 'Michael Richardson' <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: l2rs-wg-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology@ietf.org, rtg-dir@ietf.org, l2rs@ietf.org
References: <10278.1500453903@dooku.sandelman.ca> <010601d3006c$1b142790$513c76b0$@ndzh.com> <17911.1500466357@dooku.sandelman.ca>
In-Reply-To: <17911.1500466357@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 08:13:23 -0400
Message-ID: <00c901d30088$6c5c58e0$45150aa0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQFPvpLAME2Q6YrSHzyndKvOXgKJMQEuqJVcAiV1f+6jRvK2UA==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/rsu7kWjJ5CCemXx00Sx5iimIjko>
Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir Early review: draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 12:19:29 -0000

That' a good idea. 

Sue 

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Richardson [mailto:mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 8:13 AM
To: Susan Hares
Cc: l2rs-wg-chairs@ietf.org; draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology@ietf.org;
rtg-dir@ietf.org; l2rs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir Early review: draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology

Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:
    > One challenge is that your point of view on IS-IS and OSPF models was
    > countered by the Yang doctor's review.  The YANG Doctor's early review
    > removed the CODE-BEGINS/CODE-ENDS.  However, you and the YANG Doctors
    > both have good points.  As chair, I'm going to have to the I2RS AD and
    > the OPS Advice on what to do.

Perhaps EXAMPLE-CODE-BEGINS.  That way it can still be extracted from the
xml via script, but the automatic draft yang validator won't see it.



--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works  -=
IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email