IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir telechat review of draft-ietf-babel-rfc6126bis-11

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> Fri, 02 August 2019 08:30 UTC

Return-Path: <jch@irif.fr>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C388120026; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 01:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4Pm10ACcIYTB; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 01:30:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FBC8120019; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 01:30:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/82085) with ESMTP id x728U6MG017326; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 10:30:06 +0200
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C05844279; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 10:30:10 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id iytW-UuNJjkE; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 10:30:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pirx.irif.fr (unknown [78.194.40.74]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 24B0144277; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 10:30:09 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 10:30:09 +0200
Message-ID: <87imrgotpq.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
To: Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: rtg-dir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-babel-rfc6126bis.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, babel@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <87o918ou5d.wl-jch@irif.fr>
References: <156470236376.19191.1026181661457374790@ietfa.amsl.com> <87o918ou5d.wl-jch@irif.fr>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.138]); Fri, 02 Aug 2019 10:30:06 +0200 (CEST)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 5D43F48E.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 5D43F48E.000 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<jch@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 5D43F48E.000 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/sWy-goJ848U8kXU2wKSMRB1KmZc>
Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir telechat review of draft-ietf-babel-rfc6126bis-11
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 08:30:14 -0000

>> 1616    4.4.  Sub-TLV Format

>> This section is about Sub-TLV, however the description language in this
>> paragraph is mainly about TLV.

> Good catch, thanks.

Actually, this section starts by describing how sub-TLVs fit within TLVs,
so it's correct as it stands.

-- Juliusz Chroboczek

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email