[RTG-DIR] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request-06.txt
Tomonori Takeda <tomonori.takeda.fk@hco.ntt.co.jp> Tue, 16 July 2019 01:38 UTC
Return-Path: <tomonori.takeda.fk@hco.ntt.co.jp>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E97F912016C; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 18:38:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GfBKM9zj2PGU; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 18:38:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dish-sg.nttdocomo.co.jp (dish-sg.nttdocomo.co.jp [202.19.227.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFB8B1200DB; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 18:38:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-dD-Source: Outbound
Received: from zssg-mailmd105.ddreams.local (zssg-mailmd900.ddreams.local [10.160.172.63]) by zssg-mailou102.ddreams.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DEEC12012B; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 10:38:30 +0900 (JST)
Received: from zssg-mailmf106.ddreams.local (zssg-mailmf900.ddreams.local [10.160.172.84]) by zssg-mailmd105.ddreams.local (dDREAMS) with ESMTP id <0PUP012C1OK2EE40@dDREAMS>; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 10:38:26 +0900 (JST)
Received: from zssg-mailmf106.ddreams.local (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by zssg-mailmf106.ddreams.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89C457E603B; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 10:38:26 +0900 (JST)
Received: from zssg-mailmf106.ddreams.local (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 893128E6063; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 10:38:26 +0900 (JST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with SMTP id 8787E8E605F; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 10:38:26 +0900 (JST)
X-IMSS-HAND-OFF-DIRECTIVE: localhost:10026
Received: from zssg-mailmf106.ddreams.local (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB7468E6065; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 10:38:25 +0900 (JST)
Received: from zssg-mailua105.ddreams.local (unknown [10.160.172.62]) by zssg-mailmf106.ddreams.local (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 10:38:25 +0900 (JST)
Received: from RDSVVDI2579 (unknown [10.171.81.237]) by zssg-mailua105.ddreams.local (dDREAMS) with ESMTPA id <0PUP001Z5OJI2A80@dDREAMS>; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 10:38:16 +0900 (JST)
From: Tomonori Takeda <tomonori.takeda.fk@hco.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 10:38:06 +0900
Message-id: <001501d53b77$1d9775b0$58c66110$@hco.ntt.co.jp>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Content-language: ja
Thread-index: AdU7ds8A6Io6um+YQ0mmwR03HkJwkw==
To: rtg-ads@ietf.org
Cc: rtg-dir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request.all@ietf.org, pce@ietf.org
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/tWX5IzjMyQmtLYKBtw_Y_wQ4utE>
Subject: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request-06.txt
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 01:38:36 -0000
Hello, I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft. Document: draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request-06.txt Reviewer: Tomonori Takeda Review Date: July 16th, 2019 IETF LC End Date: Not known Intended Status: Standards Track Summary: This document is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be considered prior to publication. Comments: This document specifies a PCEP extension by which a PCE can request control of LSP(s) from PCC(s) over the stateful PCEP sessions. The procotol extension is simple, and its operation is well documented, including operation with PCCs that do not support the protocol extension specified in this document. Major Issues: None Minor Issues: None Nits: 1) In Section 2, it states terminologies. Since these terminologies are already defined in other documents, I would suggest to add references. 2) In Section 8.1, it says: "Further, the operator MAY be to be allowed " It should be: "Further, the operator MAY be allowed " Thanks, Tomonori Takeda
- [RTG-DIR] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-pce-lsp-contr… Tomonori Takeda