[RTG-DIR]Routing Directorate Last Call Review for "LISP Distinguished Name Encoding" - draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-08
Acee Lindem <acee.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 09 July 2024 19:33 UTC
Return-Path: <acee.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 510B4C15106A; Tue, 9 Jul 2024 12:33:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.139
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.139 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MANY_SPAN_IN_TEXT=1.955, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_HTML_ATTACH=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PFcFUif2RUSk; Tue, 9 Jul 2024 12:33:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw1-x1131.google.com (mail-yw1-x1131.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26599C110D22; Tue, 9 Jul 2024 12:33:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw1-x1131.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-64b9f11b92aso49638937b3.1; Tue, 09 Jul 2024 12:33:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1720553591; x=1721158391; darn=ietf.org; h=to:cc:date:message-id:subject:mime-version:from:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=4e96RZkxVjTjl7u8cEqhajVKftFdqB9/KoFmjIVVhPI=; b=hl6a27lRd4OHuGj48AqbiN8ZTXy//rXNG508jbl5BfCpAP34ir2hwNlIo7l2L3tkjT t3O6KgDnhw9lgUGjyBfnew6WNSjBmaQtbfMnF8p1Cg6QCRmmETeJgqxSZVfPuXKPXa/N mdaj+wdviWF9tABtdipSdSMiQSC2bAT9oETjhGfMKL4LvzVHwhbCdsFIUaLCnt5WAu8E DU8RA9yC2Ek2OOXllL2meRkRcs8HUnEFYlR97KPdUHGNu2J5R6mZXMAeS+EIVIKKwr4Z iVBdLx+N6KlQbICtxWm/QN6MJlSw2YvriYzzvVn5H0bYswvWJgDnFZ1eU9kEFFZ6zUcy ej9g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1720553591; x=1721158391; h=to:cc:date:message-id:subject:mime-version:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=4e96RZkxVjTjl7u8cEqhajVKftFdqB9/KoFmjIVVhPI=; b=rjbr2qpeXCg6B9ffValeeVi8cN1qezRC0eAPD2EzzmFjXIFoOE/8fUp8kShslHw9VD FCCyhKRbR/Z5OmHS+R3x6d0ZLoWSmBBKza1Doi5kC8vIr673meCBigSKQUAhLRrA/1kq +WUnXaceC26jxv4TsMlZoE5irVCXZy2Y/c2SgRie4S2skpKuy51LiQWKfgx8huE2oo6U q4x35OXZzwvgpKMOsxUb1n0T8qZMcwd8kgRDKQVynGSyf93uy4Dqs6iQtBpP1N8akLPq ilUo51NzfmaWu1AMx+MUMPvWaOoAJz0PMsxDwAMkOWbITknfUxD6bASoyqGgqhitBOp3 xB1A==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWNpWJSNCJeR1sL95OgY0woItCS92aVpDA3mwgH7gT7m8ZU25bGyEtAH3obkL8eluXF3YkH1iSoO+gU1Kb2c3naHC65EI3pM3X+YRdspJKR7lxU934=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy4KBNfW46C0ysVhNEMKadvNgtctE5tmDx6OQvqj46h9WtuSKjU Rifch+OfqSSPvmtm/9zCnFWOrfOhfjQxylYebmdV1DoO93A5ToCt+kTV7Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHzK15OsQ4osNeiBV5A+L2MC7Yq04i1NEKyEpTwW1IvHsxTp3I6xb5J6yVqLwmDiy9pNpA+Rw==
X-Received: by 2002:a81:8d0f:0:b0:632:c442:2316 with SMTP id 00721157ae682-658ee791229mr41427207b3.3.1720553590596; Tue, 09 Jul 2024 12:33:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([136.54.28.118]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 00721157ae682-658e65e5f75sm4573817b3.87.2024.07.09.12.33.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Jul 2024 12:33:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Acee Lindem <acee.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D1CB79E0-8B48-45C6-A941-4651642B1FBE"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.600.62\))
Message-Id: <60F5074B-1ABF-4188-BAAB-93674065EF06@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2024 15:32:59 -0400
To: draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.600.62)
Message-ID-Hash: KEQK7RII7BJOQGNLRNLCKCALA37AQF5Y
X-Message-ID-Hash: KEQK7RII7BJOQGNLRNLCKCALA37AQF5Y
X-MailFrom: acee.ietf@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-rtg-dir.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: lisp@ietf.org, rtgwg-ads@ietf.org, Routing Directorate <rtg-dir@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [RTG-DIR]Routing Directorate Last Call Review for "LISP Distinguished Name Encoding" - draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-08
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/wuIT2mDxTknK6UjhluBHs0fVYp4>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:rtg-dir-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:rtg-dir-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:rtg-dir-leave@ietf.org>
Hello, I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Early Review/Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft. Document: draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-08 Reviewer: Acee Lindem Review Date: 07/09/2024 IETF LC End Date: 2024-07-12 Intended Status: Standards Track Summary: This document specifies the Distinguished Name Address Family encoding for Endpoint Identifiers (EIDs) and Routing Locators (RLOCs). It also includes usecases for including Distinguished Names in LISP messages. My review didn't uncover any problems with the encodings or use cases. I do have some minor comments and some editorial suggestions. Major Issues: None Minor Issues: I have the following minor comments. 1. In section 3, could you more precisely define the places where the new encoding is used? I guess in any LISP message where an EID or RLOC is specified? 2. In section 5, the final sentence fragment didn't parse and it wasn't obvious to me how to edit it - "As well as identifying the router name...". 3. In section 9.2, The description of the onboarding process includes very specific details that aren't fully explained. Would it be possible to describe the use case at a higher level? 4. Remove change log prior to publication. Nits: I've attached some editorial suggestions. Thanks, Acee
- [RTG-DIR]Routing Directorate Last Call Review for… Acee Lindem
- [RTG-DIR]Re: Routing Directorate Last Call Review… Dino Farinacci
- [RTG-DIR]Re: Routing Directorate Last Call Review… Dino Farinacci
- [RTG-DIR]Re: Routing Directorate Last Call Review… Acee Lindem
- [RTG-DIR]Re: Routing Directorate Last Call Review… Marc Portoles Comeras (mportole)
- [RTG-DIR]Re: Routing Directorate Last Call Review… Acee Lindem
- [RTG-DIR]Re: Routing Directorate Last Call Review… Marc Portoles Comeras (mportole)