Re: [Rtg-dt-encap-considerations] draft-rtg-dt-encap-02 for review

On 5/14/15 8:37 PM, Larry Kreeger (kreeger) wrote:
> Hi Erik,
>
> In reviewing the document I found the following grammar issues.
>
>   - Larry
>    
>
> Section 8, 2nd para: "is a function of the preceding header the same was
>   as IPv4 being identified by both an Ethernet type and an IP protocol".
> Maybe "the same was as" -> "the same as"
I think I meant "the same way as". But also makes sense to get rid of 
the "being" to make it "the same way as IPv4 is identified ..."
>
> Section 11.4, 1st bullet: "Need extensibility to be able to add".  I would
> prepend "Encapsulations need extensibility..."
ok
>
> Section 13, "In summary" 2nd bullet: "If the encapsulation can..., the
> leverage the approach", change "the leverage" to "then leverage".
ok
>
> Section 14, "In summary" 1st bullet: "Need extensibility to be able to
> add".  I would prepend "Encapsulations need extensibility..."
ok
>
>
> Section 14, "In summary" 2nd bullet: "When encaps has checksum/CRC".
> Change "has" to "have".
How about a more complete sentence saying "When the encapsulation has a 
checksum/CRC, include the IPv6 pseudo-header in it"?

Thanks,
    Erik

>
>
>
>
> On 5/14/15 11:00 AM, "Erik Nordmark" <nordmark@sonic.net> wrote:
>
>> Attached is -02 of the document.
>>
>> Albert said he would check whether there are some additional text we
>> want to add about the control word, but I've completed the other edits
>> we have discussed.
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OvGxiNTPuncHl1N-6JH-6MJvZ3D9PK1LpjwsRg
>> ArgJ8/
>> is up to date with the issues, but doesn't have the exact same proposed
>> text changes as the I-D.
>>
>> I edited the attached diffs to remove the diffs related to the change in
>> pagination.
>>
>> Please review the changes, and check whether there are additional things
>> we should lift out to the "In summary" bulleted lists.
>>
>> It would be good to submit this next week - if anything controversial
>> shows up we can discuss it on the call next Thursday.
>>
>> Regards,
>>     Erik
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Rtg-dt-encap-considerations mailing list
> Rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dt-encap-considerations
>