Re: [Rtg-dt-encap-considerations] Proliferation of encapsulations ...

["Larry Kreeger (kreeger)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Erik,

Where you wrote "where there might already exist an encapsulation over IP
or Ethernet." do you think it would be useful to name a couple of
examples?  e.g. are you referring to GRE or something else?

 - Larry

On 5/21/15 10:12 AM, "Erik Nordmark" <[e-mail]> wrote:

>
>Based on our discussion I propose adding this text to the scope section:
>
>"While the origin and focus of this document is the routing area and in
>particular NVO3, SFC, and BIER, the considerations apply to other
>encapsulations that are being defined in the IETF and elsewhere. There
>seems to be an increase in the number of encapsulations being defined to
>run over UDP, where there might already exist an encapsulation over IP
>or Ethernet. Feedback on how these considerations apply in those
>contexts is welcome."
>Comments?
>
>
>Once that is in place and the document is out I'll send a note to the
>IESG to raise awareness.
>In that note I'll include any examples we have. Is there something other
>than draft-xu-softwire-ip-in-udp and draft-ietf-trill-over-ip that we
>should use as examples?
>
>Based on how that goes I'll raise the "profileration of encapsulations"
>with the IAB later.
>
>Thanks,
>    Erik
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Rtg-dt-encap-considerations mailing list
>[e-mail]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dt-encap-considerations