[Rtg-dt-encap-considerations] Updated draft

Erik Nordmark <nordmark@sonic.net> Mon, 09 March 2015 19:00 UTC

Return-Path: <nordmark@sonic.net>
X-Original-To: rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E21A01A92E7 for <rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 12:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.219
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.219 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FB_INCREASE_VOL=3.629, J_CHICKENPOX_16=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_54=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1yYgsSnXXjP9 for <rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 11:59:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c.mail.sonic.net (c.mail.sonic.net [64.142.111.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6ED3D1A92B3 for <Rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 11:59:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.22.227.238] ([162.210.130.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by c.mail.sonic.net (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t29Ixeog016949 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 9 Mar 2015 11:59:40 -0700
Message-ID: <54FDED9C.8060102@sonic.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 11:59:40 -0700
From: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@sonic.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org" <Rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------000403060205060907080500"
X-Sonic-CAuth: UmFuZG9tSVYUOqMuJqDmMzkTs7hgJCdVwyoxz68MOWUfcksTDCfFK0acaaCI8b7mQPsNzlWJIWYEto0iyDhnpY3hRhq7TL7n
X-Sonic-ID: C;Qlp2cI7G5BGPSO8Jj30JFw== M;Po+ucI7G5BGPSO8Jj30JFw==
X-Sonic-Spam-Details: not scanned (too big) by cerberusd
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dt-encap-considerations/BiOVmFB3X8xzedX-jttKVCy_DbQ>
Subject: [Rtg-dt-encap-considerations] Updated draft
X-BeenThere: rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Design Team on Encapsulation Considerations discussion list <rtg-dt-encap-considerations.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dt-encap-considerations>, <mailto:rtg-dt-encap-considerations-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-dt-encap-considerations/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dt-encap-considerations-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dt-encap-considerations>, <mailto:rtg-dt-encap-considerations-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 19:00:07 -0000

I've pulled in the edits/additions from Tom.
(The encap.diff file shows what changed.)

I think this is good enough to submit. Any show stoppers?

I have a few minutes to handle those after lunch and before the deadline.

    Erik