Re: [Rtg-dt-encap-considerations] draft-rtg-dt-encap-02 for review

[Erik Nordmark <[e-mail]>]

On 5/21/15 8:59 AM, Albert Tian wrote:
> Hi Erik
>
> Just a comment on the control word topic: I think the document looks 
> pretty good in the next protocol section, maybe with a minor 
> suggestion for the following sentence at the top of page 10:
>
> "
> That behavior places some constraints on other
> payloads carried over MPLS and some protocol define an initial
> control word in the payload with a value of zero in its first nibble 
> [RFC4385] to avoid confusion with IPv4
> and IPv6 payload headers.
> "
>
Thanks - I'll add that.

    Erik

> Thanks,
> Albert
>
>
>
>
> On 5/14/15, 11:00 AM, "Erik Nordmark" <[e-mail] 
> <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>
>     Attached is -02 of the document.
>
>     Albert said he would check whether there are some additional text we
>     want to add about the control word, but I've completed the other
>     edits
>     we have discussed.
>
>     https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OvGxiNTPuncHl1N-6JH-6MJvZ3D9PK1LpjwsRgArgJ8/
>
>     is up to date with the issues, but doesn't have the exact same
>     proposed
>     text changes as the I-D.
>
>     I edited the attached diffs to remove the diffs related to the
>     change in
>     pagination.
>
>     Please review the changes, and check whether there are additional
>     things
>     we should lift out to the "In summary" bulleted lists.
>
>     It would be good to submit this next week - if anything controversial
>     shows up we can discuss it on the call next Thursday.
>
>     Regards,
>         Erik
>
>