Re: [Rtg-dt-encap-considerations] overlay encapsulation group

Erik Nordmark <nordmark@sonic.net> Thu, 02 April 2015 20:50 UTC

Return-Path: <nordmark@sonic.net>
X-Original-To: rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 368771A1B16 for <rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 13:50:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w9fjEYxLf_9n for <rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 13:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c.mail.sonic.net (c.mail.sonic.net [64.142.111.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C9641A1B0B for <Rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 13:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.22.227.238] ([162.210.130.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by c.mail.sonic.net (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t32KoZ7a004636 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 2 Apr 2015 13:50:36 -0700
Message-ID: <551DAB9B.3010309@sonic.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 13:50:35 -0700
From: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@sonic.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
References: <366DD3DD-A092-421F-B1C3-03BEDF1FE126@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <366DD3DD-A092-421F-B1C3-03BEDF1FE126@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Sonic-CAuth: UmFuZG9tSVYIKWeotwncCVVCYjonL4+m0pLBLFUVyD8BZ3hS34W+KI6ACbkDOfEgbVgWHJn2DPoZuae6qTwLwjDwbhWH+ZB1
X-Sonic-ID: C;/HQ56XnZ5BGwuNBwQIsAyQ== M;YnSX6XnZ5BGwuNBwQIsAyQ==
X-Sonic-Spam-Details: 0.0/5.0 by cerberusd
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dt-encap-considerations/SDeSJi3L8m1aH4d5rifO3ZVx-sE>
Cc: "rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org" <Rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Rtg-dt-encap-considerations] overlay encapsulation group
X-BeenThere: rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Design Team on Encapsulation Considerations discussion list <rtg-dt-encap-considerations.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dt-encap-considerations>, <mailto:rtg-dt-encap-considerations-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-dt-encap-considerations/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dt-encap-considerations-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dt-encap-considerations>, <mailto:rtg-dt-encap-considerations-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 20:50:43 -0000

On 3/24/15 2:27 PM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
> I wonder what your group thinks about draft-baker-openstack-ipv6-model.

Fred,
We've looked briefly at the draft but I for one didn't quite understand 
the essence of the proposal.
The draft seems to be about the IPv6 addressing plan for the datacenter. 
Is it also claiming that an encaps is insufficient if the VNI ID is 
encoded somewhere else (e.g., in the IPv6 address)?

Thanks,
     Erik

>
> I have an update in progress, which I have attached; I’m still adding the use of MAP-T/E for IPv4 as a service, and plan to repost when done with that. So think of this as an early version of -03.
>