IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Rtg-dt-encap-considerations] Fwd: overlay encapsulation group

Erik Nordmark <nordmark@sonic.net> Tue, 24 March 2015 22:01 UTC

Return-Path: <nordmark@sonic.net>
X-Original-To: rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94BF91A0404 for <rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:01:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.09 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eWIW3SXDanPW for <rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:01:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from d.mail.sonic.net (d.mail.sonic.net [64.142.111.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95ACD1AC444 for <Rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:01:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.22.239.40] ([162.210.130.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by d.mail.sonic.net (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t2OM1ThD029385 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:01:30 -0700
Message-ID: <5511DEB9.2060106@sonic.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 17:01:29 -0500
From: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@sonic.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org" <Rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org>
References: <366DD3DD-A092-421F-B1C3-03BEDF1FE126@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <366DD3DD-A092-421F-B1C3-03BEDF1FE126@cisco.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <366DD3DD-A092-421F-B1C3-03BEDF1FE126@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------090300030900080308040500"
X-Sonic-CAuth: UmFuZG9tSVZt4clpFW3h85AXH77wME+UXY4KHHqLSf6OOhjAkTED6KZSkHzCVmFKphNfiG5HqX1Sfu7fusylSwWOgpGAHAmY
X-Sonic-ID: C;vmVAU3HS5BGh56Sqki+G8Q== M;iiqHU3HS5BGh56Sqki+G8Q==
X-Sonic-Spam-Details: 0.0/5.0 by cerberusd
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dt-encap-considerations/lukj0pgcKEXx8tAMSDsj88bIqec>
Cc: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Subject: [Rtg-dt-encap-considerations] Fwd: overlay encapsulation group
X-BeenThere: rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Design Team on Encapsulation Considerations discussion list <rtg-dt-encap-considerations.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dt-encap-considerations>, <mailto:rtg-dt-encap-considerations-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-dt-encap-considerations/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dt-encap-considerations-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dt-encap-considerations>, <mailto:rtg-dt-encap-considerations-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 22:01:53 -0000

I haven't looked at this yet - might be of interest.

    Erik


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	overlay encapsulation group
Date: 	Tue, 24 Mar 2015 21:27:50 +0000
From: 	Fred Baker (fred) <fred@cisco.com>
To: 	nordmark@acm.org <nordmark@acm.org>



I wonder what your group thinks about draft-baker-openstack-ipv6-model.

I have an update in progress, which I have attached; I’m still adding the use of MAP-T/E for IPv4 as a service, and plan to repost when done with that. So think of this as an early version of -03.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email