IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rtg-dt-encap-considerations] [Bier] Encapsulation considerations

Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com> Wed, 25 March 2015 14:11 UTC

Return-Path: <tonysietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34F921AD0D7; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 07:11:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sQiK_RdXWKzs; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 07:11:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x235.google.com (mail-ig0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 856051AD26B; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 07:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by igbud6 with SMTP id ud6so102248786igb.1; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 07:11:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=BZY7BnxDl3JvKV1koMSjKgFXmy9IQpeqERwNAr1UP3o=; b=sGRMfTiMObNDZ0WcpfTyMI1AfzspHyxEFw/4vdhh2RN0taqRg8NyAHLnnCwAuzxh31 9Q5qa0B0XZqJNmHuUO4Cw6F/dZVCSuxii3Rilif0aRiXjfzWeA7DdHRyzP7bLUJ4pcg4 FyY7VCRmgGRxWCRlFyVx0waIBFbzuYBA1xBYdP9IPSXqCrkdpTIZQPB8bASOIH/g3f3/ ZU+K8OakHU7fgcFz7UWj8/ZU6YDrsnOW7vZI1ThppnjL0PylTBiey0kzXw9PdhzmZKg1 mIDyels2bLSI9DsGeRmp8CdY23K4V+5az8LTYQ7OqDNQ0tc6n5bxAy8mmZPd1XmzZjA0 sPSw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.141.199 with SMTP id rq7mr30283153igb.4.1427292678959; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 07:11:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.107.38.129 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 07:11:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55123CA6.8070502@acm.org>
References: <55123CA6.8070502@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 09:11:18 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+wi2hNk8xZWtqbmeUiSY3mheuBr00cY8yKE_m9Oh7r4yh-qyQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
To: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e013a123c1eb82305121d79f2"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dt-encap-considerations/vKfFyJ4l-CS0MSV3d-5XFcx_mSs>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 08:34:43 -0700
Cc: "bier@ietf.org" <bier@ietf.org>, "rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org" <Rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Rtg-dt-encap-considerations] [Bier] Encapsulation considerations
X-BeenThere: rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Design Team on Encapsulation Considerations discussion list <rtg-dt-encap-considerations.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dt-encap-considerations>, <mailto:rtg-dt-encap-considerations-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-dt-encap-considerations/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dt-encap-considerations-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dt-encap-considerations>, <mailto:rtg-dt-encap-considerations-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 14:11:33 -0000

highly recommended reading IMO given that we have the privilege to define
encapsulations in our charter

thanks

--- tony

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:42 PM, Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org> wrote:

> I don't know to what extent folks are paying attention to RTGWG but I
> presented the report from the encapsulation design team this afternoon.
> The draft is
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rtg-dt-encap/
> and the slides are at
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/92/slides/slides-92-rtgwg-8.pdf
>
> There is probably things in there to consider for BIER, and things that
> can be reused to make it easier to move BIER forward.
>
> Sorry for not sending things out to the WG earlier.
>    Erik
>
> _______________________________________________
> BIER mailing list
> BIER@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email