IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Rtg-dt-encap-considerations] draft-rtg-dt-encap-02 for review

Erik Nordmark <nordmark@sonic.net> Thu, 14 May 2015 18:00 UTC

Return-Path: <nordmark@sonic.net>
X-Original-To: rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 803601B2CD1 for <rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 May 2015 11:00:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.619
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.619 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FB_INCREASE_VOL=3.629, J_CHICKENPOX_16=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZilHMQQs3z0h for <rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 May 2015 11:00:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c.mail.sonic.net (c.mail.sonic.net [64.142.111.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEE9A1B2CD8 for <Rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 May 2015 11:00:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.22.227.238] ([162.210.130.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by c.mail.sonic.net (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t4EI0VwW031319 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 14 May 2015 11:00:31 -0700
Message-ID: <5554E2C1.3000306@sonic.net>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 11:00:33 -0700
From: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@sonic.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org" <Rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------050606070606030904030301"
X-Sonic-CAuth: UmFuZG9tSVbQNNpdsi03C67vzzvfQtVPcQub3QyanFL61U5yZo4C1UHhhg4QxYmDhCNO6VUdd8We7eEkSXVIomzVqdNpWvTi
X-Sonic-ID: C;xnODHGP65BGmqfjYVPtzAg== M;XqakHGP65BGmqfjYVPtzAg==
X-Sonic-Spam-Details: not scanned (too big) by cerberusd
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dt-encap-considerations/vjdZc9l5Z-sB0K-ibCKDZGBIMSk>
Subject: [Rtg-dt-encap-considerations] draft-rtg-dt-encap-02 for review
X-BeenThere: rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Design Team on Encapsulation Considerations discussion list <rtg-dt-encap-considerations.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dt-encap-considerations>, <mailto:rtg-dt-encap-considerations-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-dt-encap-considerations/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dt-encap-considerations-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dt-encap-considerations>, <mailto:rtg-dt-encap-considerations-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 18:00:58 -0000

Attached is -02 of the document.

Albert said he would check whether there are some additional text we 
want to add about the control word, but I've completed the other edits 
we have discussed.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OvGxiNTPuncHl1N-6JH-6MJvZ3D9PK1LpjwsRgArgJ8/ 
is up to date with the issues, but doesn't have the exact same proposed 
text changes as the I-D.

I edited the attached diffs to remove the diffs related to the change in 
pagination.

Please review the changes, and check whether there are additional things 
we should lift out to the "In summary" bulleted lists.

It would be good to submit this next week - if anything controversial 
shows up we can discuss it on the call next Thursday.

Regards,
    Erik

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email