[Rtg-dt-encap-considerations] Fwd: Re: encaps next steps?

Erik Nordmark <nordmark@sonic.net> Wed, 01 April 2015 14:30 UTC

Message-ID: <551C0111.80100@sonic.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 07:30:41 -0700
From: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@sonic.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org" <Rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org>
References: <CAG4d1rfx3uB751zHioPiOtj1Vs3o5as0+g4UnXhOWnq4nrUrcQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG4d1rfx3uB751zHioPiOtj1Vs3o5as0+g4UnXhOWnq4nrUrcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dt-encap-considerations/zNFO1VyJkeeaX9TL_6B7pMYu-5s>
Subject: [Rtg-dt-encap-considerations] Fwd: Re: encaps next steps?
Precedence: list

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	Re: encaps next steps?
Date: 	Fri, 27 Mar 2015 14:46:47 -0400
From: 	Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
To: 	Erik Nordmark <nordmark@sonic.net>

I was going to try and chat with you about it.
I would prefer to see it expand to include MPLS encaps as well
or even bare over layer-2, but I don't know if there is interest/energy.

I'm still interested in seeing what consensus there is for doing more
details on the order of a check-list of ways to handle.

I think the draft went over very very well and there'll be excitement
for it to go forward.

Alia

On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Erik Nordmark <nordmark@sonic.net 
<mailto:nordmark@sonic.net>> wrote:

    Apart from making it a RTGWG document, what do you have in mind for
    the future?

    We do have some minor suggested changes that we need to collect.

        Erik

[Rtg-dt-encap-considerations] Fwd: Re: encaps nex… Erik Nordmark