IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rtg-dt-encap-considerations] draft-rtg-dt-encap-02 for review

"Larry Kreeger (kreeger)" <kreeger@cisco.com> Wed, 20 May 2015 21:11 UTC

Return-Path: <kreeger@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A717D1A90C5 for <rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 May 2015 14:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id km04iuqP5wfE for <rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 May 2015 14:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CB041A90A1 for <Rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 May 2015 14:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=570; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1432156304; x=1433365904; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=XhcLIQRCEG9OY4h+UYzJIw0p6zZ3gg9DsrUFgDx3+f0=; b=UGd9GumpDS827LFeCvVGGdUHt18fSuxeD/iqRhSITKBPkeemsn0KtUAu ZtQc+2mdAidjLATTWu/i0jA1+kXuUeCU9+si0ae2ZbHdtJ9Tm5dZTNMRZ tVyz9b5dFNzOxVj1i+/2Uk8b6p1hX9wDS11GNSQz9aacrsvdBqQPkuuka s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AJBQDJ91xV/5NdJa1cgxCBMgbLMgKBPkwBAQEBAQGBC4QjAQEEOk8CAQg2EDIlAgQBEogszy0BAQEBAQEBAwEBAQEBARyLOoUMhC0BBJJwiwCBJ5IUg1kjg3hvgUaBAQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,466,1427760000"; d="scan'208";a="421376132"
Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 May 2015 21:10:43 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com [173.36.12.85]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t4KLAhwZ014703 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 20 May 2015 21:10:43 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([169.254.1.6]) by xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com ([173.36.12.85]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 20 May 2015 16:10:43 -0500
From: "Larry Kreeger (kreeger)" <kreeger@cisco.com>
To: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@sonic.net>, "rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org" <Rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Rtg-dt-encap-considerations] draft-rtg-dt-encap-02 for review
Thread-Index: AQHQjm/4os07u12chEOyOvSlkY94M52EMU2AgAE2IYCAABlCgP//w9GA
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 21:10:42 +0000
Message-ID: <D18245E2.148CE7%kreeger@cisco.com>
References: <5554E2C1.3000306@sonic.net> <CALx6S34kcZd9xg=eQ=Dq85uB4RBHFad9-_UWrJ5yuGvG=9zjQw@mail.gmail.com> <555CB339.4080407@sonic.net> <555CC869.4090805@sonic.net>
In-Reply-To: <555CC869.4090805@sonic.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.9.150325
x-originating-ip: [10.24.47.9]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <C027D9C2922F224CB792761DC412CC2E@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dt-encap-considerations/zr5Gcx17GGQxj0BRqhnYewHswGA>
Subject: Re: [Rtg-dt-encap-considerations] draft-rtg-dt-encap-02 for review
X-BeenThere: rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Design Team on Encapsulation Considerations discussion list <rtg-dt-encap-considerations.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dt-encap-considerations>, <mailto:rtg-dt-encap-considerations-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-dt-encap-considerations/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dt-encap-considerations-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dt-encap-considerations>, <mailto:rtg-dt-encap-considerations-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 21:11:45 -0000

I agree with your concerns Erik.  One way to handle this would be to add
more text explaining that there will be classes of devices (e.g.
cut-through switches) that never will be able to do this due to their
nature.

 - Larry

On 5/20/15 10:46 AM, "Erik Nordmark" <nordmark@sonic.net> wrote:

>Two open issues remain right now.
>Tom suggested:
>> Would change "Avoid full packet checksums in encapsulation if
>> possible" to "Avoid full packet checksums in cases where necessary
>> devices cannot support them"
>I expressed some concern about that below.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email