IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rtg-yang-coord] [i2rs] [netmod] Requirements for I2RS protocol and I2RS interim (6/24/2015 at 10:00 - 11:30am ET)

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Thu, 02 July 2015 21:06 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8BA01A1A59; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 14:06:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.054
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.054 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Skv4ZI2vbl91; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 14:06:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (hhc-web3.hickoryhill-consulting.com [64.9.205.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 253CC1A1A78; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 14:06:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=174.124.185.134;
From: "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com>
To: "'Mahesh Jethanandani'" <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, "'Eric Voit \(evoit\)'" <evoit@cisco.com>
References: <00d901d0ade1$194280e0$4bc782a0$@ndzh.com> <D8FF75B2-4BB4-4A98-989B-10A2E480EBEF@gmail.com> <007501d0b37a$02d6fbd0$0884f370$@ndzh.com> <EF64FF31F4C4384DBCE5D513A791C2B121B00EE1@xmb-aln-x11.cisco.com> <1AA8FB3B-E17A-4DEC-9F06-1424A0638500@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1AA8FB3B-E17A-4DEC-9F06-1424A0638500@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 17:06:41 -0400
Message-ID: <01d801d0b50a$feeed5f0$fccc81d0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01D9_01D0B4E9.77DEBC90"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQISFdXuYb8FEw5zRd6nzKGMwfXW3QKbN0DLAkJXomwCCiG/twIuXbN7nP05VtA=
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-yang-coord/53KW-woyQ8jLA58_YCWlJpuu-EE>
Cc: Rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org, i2rs@ietf.org, 'NETMOD Working Group' <netmod@ietf.org>, "'BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A'" <db3546@att.com>, "'Alexander Clemm \(alex\)'" <alex@cisco.com>, 'Netconf' <netconf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Rtg-yang-coord] [i2rs] [netmod] Requirements for I2RS protocol and I2RS interim (6/24/2015 at 10:00 - 11:30am ET)
X-BeenThere: rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"List to discuss coordination between the Routing related YANG models\"" <rtg-yang-coord.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-yang-coord>, <mailto:rtg-yang-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-yang-coord/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-yang-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-yang-coord>, <mailto:rtg-yang-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 21:06:44 -0000

Mahesh: 

 

I think this would really help show how the requirements can be met. Let’s plan on Eric doing an analysis of what requirements are met by “draft-clemm-netconf-yang-push”. 

 

Sue 

 

From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mahesh Jethanandani
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 5:06 PM
To: Eric Voit (evoit)
Cc: Rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org; i2rs@ietf.org; NETMOD Working Group; BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A; Alexander Clemm (alex); Netconf; Susan Hares
Subject: Re: [i2rs] [Rtg-yang-coord] [netmod] Requirements for I2RS protocol and I2RS interim (6/24/2015 at 10:00 - 11:30am ET)

 

 

On Jun 30, 2015, at 3:13 PM, Eric Voit (evoit) <evoit@cisco.com> wrote:

 

What might be interesting for a NETCONF speaking slot is an analysis of what requirements from “draft-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements” are met by “draft-clemm-netconf-yang-push”. 

 

Susan or somebody from i2rs WG can decide whether the suggested presentation would help clarify i2rs requirements to NETCONF. From a personal perspective it would certainly help to have examples of how the requirements could be met.

 

Cheers.

 

Mahesh Jethanandani

mjethanandani@gmail.com

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email