Re: [Rtg-yang-coord] issue :R03: assignment of interfaces to routing instances

Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> Wed, 14 January 2015 16:07 UTC

Return-Path: <lhotka@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13B781A8AFE for <rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 08:07:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.661
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.661 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_CZ=0.445, HOST_EQ_CZ=0.904, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q4EHidhOe3m4 for <rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 08:07:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.nic.cz (mail.nic.cz [IPv6:2001:1488:800:400::400]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D91C1A8ADF for <rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 08:07:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.29.2.202] (unknown [77.48.225.14]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B5AA41416E4; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 17:07:15 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nic.cz; s=default; t=1421251635; bh=WyNY9ElyyrpDi2KzseH/FjW4zRduuQTVTe24iK1uJTo=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=PquayO4GeRYD9nSdR2kPOd4cgfwmZzjk2uboluMgmGLhIXp/nrnDLMpq+VMC1MCIU U3ouku3OXiI5hawdZPu41Di5CexFWtMwlpeSEUzZNmL3PfC6iNuI/wLfVjL27/aqiK zQmCpfyxWmsNi2bIznFFlu1+LcHEIN7oLsCIuNC4=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\))
From: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
In-Reply-To: <AAB1CC9C17CBA440BDFA169056B93B9EB1139B@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 17:07:16 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7B150A96-FD01-4542-BAE5-241D6AB0C27A@nic.cz>
References: <m2wq6j5skf.fsf@nic.cz> <D0D9CB3F.B6C0%acee@cisco.com> <8022061D-AB8F-4A97-84E7-A6E4F898F57F@nic.cz> <AAB1CC9C17CBA440BDFA169056B93B9EB10521@eusaamb107.ericsson.se> <35023717-7EE8-4F45-B2F4-B24E0F86FA5A@nic.cz> <20150113212732.GD1545@elstar.local> <23976026-499F-4C9C-844A-DB53BE244992@nic.cz> <AAB1CC9C17CBA440BDFA169056B93B9EB1128D@eusaamb107.ericsson.se> <20150114155450.GA3625@elstar.local> <AAB1CC9C17CBA440BDFA169056B93B9EB1139B@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
To: Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993)
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.1 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-yang-coord/57mh2oPJoxk1lnB8Iqqa2NHHTGU>
Cc: "rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org" <rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org>, "Acee Lindem \(acee\)" <acee@cisco.com>, =?utf-8?Q?J=C3=BCrgen_Sch=C3=B6nw=C3=A4lder?= <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
Subject: Re: [Rtg-yang-coord] issue :R03: assignment of interfaces to routing instances
X-BeenThere: rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"List to discuss coordination between the Routing related YANG models\"" <rtg-yang-coord.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-yang-coord>, <mailto:rtg-yang-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-yang-coord/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-yang-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-yang-coord>, <mailto:rtg-yang-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:07:20 -0000

> On 14 Jan 2015, at 16:59, Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 10:55 AM
>> To: Xufeng Liu
>> Cc: Ladislav Lhotka; rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org; Acee Lindem (acee)
>> Subject: Re: [Rtg-yang-coord] issue :R03: assignment of interfaces to routing
>> instances
>> 
>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 03:33:02PM +0000, Xufeng Liu wrote:
>>>>> 
>>> [Xufeng] Hi Lada, I acknowledge the difficulties here. However, is there a good
>> way to handle the following case?
>>> 	In routing-instance "RI-A", an interface named "IF-1" is already
>> configured.
>>> 	In routing-instance "RI-B", I'd like to configure an different interface
>> with the same name "IF-1".
>> 
>> In the RFC 7223 interface data model the interface name is used as a key and
>> hence you can't have two different interfaces with the same name.
>> 
>> /js
> 
> [Xufeng] This is the issue that we'd like to solve. We have such a use case.

Can you give us more details about this use case? Clearly IP adresses of interfaces belonging to different routing instances can be conflicting but I don’t understand why the interface names need to be the same.

Lada

>  
> 
>> 
>> --
>> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
>> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
>> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>

--
Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C