Re: [Rtg-yang-coord] I-D Action: draft-openconfig-mpls-consolidated-model-00.txt

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Thu, 19 March 2015 10:05 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B90AB1A00F3; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 03:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4tARtORL02bm; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 03:05:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE3FF1A8973; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 03:04:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.20.11.241] (unknown [46.218.58.213]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4615F1801127; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:04:50 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <550A9F40.10109@pi.nu>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:04:48 +0100
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, Joshua George <jgeorge@google.com>, Alia Atlas <akatlas@juniper.net>
References: <20150309224815.8246.60629.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <14c12af9498.27e9.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net> <14c12b948f8.27e9.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net> <CAKL6Z6kXHuARkLtVT19TmLwtOGnrur_7KgOgP91p+5tMFxTF3A@mail.gmail.com> <5507588A.9010105@labn.net> <5507E141.5010807@pi.nu> <550841BA.4040205@labn.net> <55084C4D.3050107@pi.nu> <5508522E.8020402@labn.net> <63CB93BC589C1B4BAFDB41A0A19B7ACD1A05F905@USIDCWVEMBX08.corp.global.level3.com> <D12DCF90.10C80%acee@cisco.com> <5509AB9E.6090201@labn.net> <550A95DF.4080805@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <550A95DF.4080805@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-yang-coord/83ynNYPVmu4EZ4CSAbZIytR4sI0>
Cc: "draft-openconfig-mpls-consolidated-model@ietf.org" <draft-openconfig-mpls-consolidated-model@ietf.org>, "rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org" <rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Rtg-yang-coord] I-D Action: draft-openconfig-mpls-consolidated-model-00.txt
X-BeenThere: rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"List to discuss coordination between the Routing related YANG models\"" <rtg-yang-coord.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-yang-coord>, <mailto:rtg-yang-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-yang-coord/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-yang-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-yang-coord>, <mailto:rtg-yang-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 10:05:06 -0000

All,

This of course triggered the obvious question - "What is your plan"?

So what I'd like to to see for draft-openconfig-mpls-consolidated-model
discussions in Dallas is

- that the discussion on the overall structure goes to the rtgwg
- that the technology specific parts are discussed in the relevant
   working group; it see the following wg's that (should) have an
   interest in this
   - teas
   - mpls
   - spring
   - i2rs (?), this might be more of an interest in the overall
     structure.

For mpls this discussion will take place on Friday, if we during the
week can agree on a plan forward, and we need time to socialize that
I think there are a few minutes available in the mpls meeting do that.

/Loa



On 2015-03-19 10:24, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I have not seen any reaction to this, what is the plan?
>
> /Loa
>
> On 2015-03-18 17:45, Lou Berger wrote:
>>
>> Sounds like there's a plan afoot to give rtgwg time to discuss this
>> thread/draft (as well as relive some of the overall time constraints. )
>>    My understanding is that the overall structure  &  base document will
>> be discussed there, while the other WG-specific information / sub-models
>> (e.g., LDP, RSVP, TE, SR, ...) will covered in their respective WGs.
>>
>> Alia/ADs/Authors,
>>
>> Can you confirm?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Lou
>>
>> On 3/17/2015 12:35 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
>>> RTGWG agenda is already jam packed - no room for any additions.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rtg-yang-coord mailing list
>> Rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-yang-coord
>>
>

-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64