IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rtg-yang-coord] [i2rs] Requirements for I2RS protocol and I2RS interim (6/24/2015 at 10:00 - 11:30am ET)

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Wed, 01 July 2015 19:55 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E4361A88B8 for <rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 12:55:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.667
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jEI2b4F9he0o for <rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 12:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.18.3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 396F71A88E9 for <Rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 12:54:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 24735 invoked by uid 0); 1 Jul 2015 19:54:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO CMOut01) (10.0.90.82) by gproxy2.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 1 Jul 2015 19:54:51 -0000
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by CMOut01 with id n7kQ1q00C2SSUrH017kTUh; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 13:44:29 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=ALgDonD0 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=AGkejYDSTmIA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=zOBTXjUuO1YA:10 a=ZI-4lMHfUVQ3Q4pe8LIA:9 a=axkuzOC8j6Qsf7DD:21 a=Mrpmenl6cEJZxDNc:21 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=3RyW9Of3GcGo2/hY1Z0HA5biKsraQv8K8eUQVXAXJcU=; b=AsNhExaC6RNdr+jAVPOL3qw/HXHJ95hFdTzATP6SHgMXoz8xE9nrtQ2AdF/nPhG4Axj3N3um8OYncw0j/8WE95BxmJ9h8jtsFcJK5zi1aK43owurvCEqiFKTJzOQ2Jcx;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:33860 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1ZAO5l-0008HN-Bi; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 13:54:45 -0600
Message-ID: <5594457F.9040107@labn.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 15:54:39 -0400
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
References: <00d901d0ade1$194280e0$4bc782a0$@ndzh.com> <5594097C.70607@labn.net> <20150701193614.GB5848@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150701193614.GB5848@pfrc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-yang-coord/FTehgDuJffRu6GrRsavIECEz02w>
Cc: Rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org, i2rs@ietf.org, "'BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A'" <db3546@att.com>, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vbeeram@juniper.net>, "'Alvaro Retana \(aretana\)'" <aretana@cisco.com>, 'Alia Atlas' <akatlas@gmail.com>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Subject: Re: [Rtg-yang-coord] [i2rs] Requirements for I2RS protocol and I2RS interim (6/24/2015 at 10:00 - 11:30am ET)
X-BeenThere: rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"List to discuss coordination between the Routing related YANG models\"" <rtg-yang-coord.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-yang-coord>, <mailto:rtg-yang-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-yang-coord/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-yang-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-yang-coord>, <mailto:rtg-yang-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 19:55:09 -0000

Jeff,
    Thank you for the response.  All sounds right.  I have a couple of
additional points included below that I suspect we agree on.

On 7/1/2015 3:36 PM, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
...
> The best I can recommend at this time is lets make sure everyone is paying
> attention to both drafts, identifying common components and be aware that we
> may need to reconcile the models via refactoring when the time comes.  Plus
> it gets more eyeballs on both models.
Agreed.  Perhaps we can get a time for the authors of the I2RS and TEAS
drafts to sit together in Prague to try to work through some of the
details - or at least ensure they are on the same technical page? I
talked to Pavan and he's willing to setup this up/coordinate.

>> > I believe that the authors of the respective drafts are already are
>> > working this.  (Pavan, my co-chair as well as coauthor of the TEAS yang
>> > model, can comment on this.)
> I'm going to largely say, "Don't Panic".  We all want to do the right thing
> IETF-wise.

I think we should ensure that we don't produce two models for the same
thing -- this is a "motherhood" statement, so I'd be surprised if
there's any disagreement on this point.

Thanks,
Lou

> -- Jeff

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email