Re: [Rtg-yang-coord] yang models intended for the mpls wg

Dear Acee,

please note that the interfaces model plus the IP model plus the core
system model plus the SNMP configuration model the IETF agreed on are
defined in RFC 7223, RFC 7277, RFC 7317, and RFC 7407. All these RFCs
were produced by the NETMOD working group.  Work is starting in other
SDOs to extend these models. Hence, I think any attempts to replace
them with something different should not only be discussed on the
NETMOD list but also seek support from the NETMOD working group.

Note that https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-yang-coord says:

    The rtg-yang-coord mailing list will provide a forum for
    coordination of the development of YANG models being worked on for
    Routing, in order to provide a consistent view to the NMS.

It seems some of the content of draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model-00
seems to leave the routing scope.

/js

On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 06:48:10PM +0000, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> Hi Mahesh,
> 
> Please comment on https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model/ as this is the latest view of the design team.
> 
> Thanks,
> Acee
> 
> From: Rtg-yang-coord <rtg-yang-coord-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:rtg-yang-coord-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com<mailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com>>
> Date: Sunday, July 26, 2015 at 4:31 PM
> To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net<mailto:lberger@labn.net>>
> Cc: Routing YANG <rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org<mailto:rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org>>, YANG Doctors <yang-doctors@ietf.org<mailto:yang-doctors@ietf.org>>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu<mailto:loa@pi.nu>>
> Subject: Re: [Rtg-yang-coord] yang models intended for the mpls wg
> 
> Lou,
> 
> I like the approach taken in the draft draft-openconfig-mpls-consolidated-model. In particular, the approach represented in this tree model makes sense to me.
> 
> 
>    +--rw mpls!
>          +--rw global
>          |     ...
>          +--rw te-global-attributes
>          |     ...
>          +--rw signaling-protocols
>          |     ...
>          +--rw lsps
>                ...
> 
> 
> However, by its own admission, the draft says:
> 
> 
> This model does not aim to be feature complete (i.e., cover all
>    possible aspects or features of MPLS).
> 
> My suggestion would be for the MPLS WG to take up the model structure as represented above and to do a more complete work of including all features of MPLS, e.g. GMPLS.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Mahesh Jethanandani
> mjethanandani@gmail.com<mailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

> _______________________________________________
> Rtg-yang-coord mailing list
> Rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-yang-coord

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>