IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rtg-yang-coord] [i2rs] Requirements for I2RS protocol and I2RS interim (6/24/2015 at 10:00 - 11:30am ET)

Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com> Mon, 06 July 2015 20:14 UTC

Return-Path: <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E5A1B31AF for <rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 13:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rRvy0GMi8DMp for <rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 13:14:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x236.google.com (mail-ig0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02A7D1B31A2 for <rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 13:14:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by igau2 with SMTP id u2so20519311iga.0 for <rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org>; Mon, 06 Jul 2015 13:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OIeEd+Dub92aE7wCQoJ/utt7uk9RYnOfeo/CrdQcPqU=; b=HgD/wDuwNrvTrWjz/PAH5amrFtxpg3jzsEO1IPIOYqwPJ1P5u8DUFDYUhIk9i+WMqZ YEtLgvzNDpUrcK7jZG1T5FUrFzEAOpu4qpLfEznQc/Td5PIEq8Dxsk6zDvcL1ctJQFg0 dlYM9D5/b2r6oPvCFXgTHlB+zmzndpHLxj7pmhdi0lHKeJF6fqxkrHUW7ZahktTtM5aw 56hj7jEw5zZHjG7oExuRWezaSVhEzudArkWbThTl4JC3NIILt53kjc7xiOTvTBRjIgzL Hkq6Bp6vdaTC38m93tH7vacsrDnzEivVWGciLcalLbjEheEPTUK0DEx6bOvqkiqKlyD+ iHUQ==
X-Received: by 10.50.136.134 with SMTP id qa6mr45238576igb.26.1436213663445; Mon, 06 Jul 2015 13:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.135] ([108.63.184.68]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 137sm13112387ioo.29.2015.07.06.13.14.22 for <rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Jul 2015 13:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
To: rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org
References: <00d901d0ade1$194280e0$4bc782a0$@ndzh.com> <5594097C.70607@labn.net> <00d801d0b450$250e4560$6f2ad020$@ndzh.com> <CA+YzgTsJOptCtNqqccsFxGR6y+-kua2dW6NBsPru4fZY4PxnOg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <559AE19E.9090004@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 16:14:22 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTsJOptCtNqqccsFxGR6y+-kua2dW6NBsPru4fZY4PxnOg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-yang-coord/MBcRpkhsVqB-b5jUJpOwt9aQ6xo>
Subject: Re: [Rtg-yang-coord] [i2rs] Requirements for I2RS protocol and I2RS interim (6/24/2015 at 10:00 - 11:30am ET)
X-BeenThere: rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"List to discuss coordination between the Routing related YANG models\"" <rtg-yang-coord.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-yang-coord>, <mailto:rtg-yang-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-yang-coord/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-yang-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-yang-coord>, <mailto:rtg-yang-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 20:14:25 -0000

In theory, at least, LIME needs a topology model, but it has to cover 
multiple layers. I'll keep an eye on this work.

Tom Taylor

On 01/07/2015 8:41 PM, Vishnu Pavan Beeram wrote:
> + Alex
> + <te-topo-model> authors
>
> Sue, Jeff,
>
> The authors of the <te-topo-model> draft had a meeting today with one of
> the authors (Alex) of the <network-topo-model> draft and discussed ways to
> align the topo models. The consensus so far is that the <te-topo-model>
> WILL augment the <network-topo-model>. There are some issues that need to
> be worked out (mapping identifiers, termination-points), but those should
> get resolved in due course of time.
>
> I'll sync up with you (Sue) and coordinate a meeting between the authors of
> the <te-topo-model> and the authors of the I2RS topo model(s) at the IETF
> --- hopefully early in the week.
>
> Regards,
> -Pavan
>
...

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email