IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rtg-yang-coord] yang models intended for the mpls wg

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Sun, 26 July 2015 18:48 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D441ACD5B; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 11:48:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p4Vh2dk0Na86; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 11:48:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CAEC1ACD58; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 11:48:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8597; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1437936491; x=1439146091; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=cjg6E0Ym/7l11QVi9RvFQpI/LQ5V8P+LkqkkR94I+8k=; b=giD3Zn8Xe2HBmyQeYtbJPt/PqySDyrMvSL7XmgXJ+EkCRirHWVm6CAkO crNwUxoYGhJf/CODhXxQ/ZlOXyLUuDCQwX/7xGHJnLaFdmfk1oSwc9Ef5 BajoTuBEy5yDcgqHruvRks2o07O0hb+zOrnnzdgo+r+OR2NK0B1jlqaed s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A6BQCKKrVV/5ldJa1bgkhNVGkGgx26ZYV5AhyBEDsRAQEBAQEBAYEKhCMBAQEEI1YQAgEIDgMDAQIoAwICAh8RFAkIAgQBDQWIGQMSDblRkBANhS8BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQETBItOgk6CKBEHgmmBQwWRbIJ9AYR3hV+BaoFFhB2MGYcrJoN9b4FIgQQBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,548,1432598400"; d="scan'208,217";a="172551553"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 26 Jul 2015 18:48:10 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com [173.37.183.84]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t6QImA23024692 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sun, 26 Jul 2015 18:48:10 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.37]) by xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([173.37.183.84]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 13:48:10 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Thread-Topic: [Rtg-yang-coord] yang models intended for the mpls wg
Thread-Index: AQHQxfSyi6GkxZ0SP0mkMfmRdOmqGZ3q7/2AgALp5gCAAE2dgIAABKOA
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 18:48:10 +0000
Message-ID: <D1DAA351.298BB%acee@cisco.com>
References: <55B207DD.8060502@pi.nu> <5436B667-6766-4F3D-902E-C4929D4A0240@gmail.com> <55B4AE36.5040203@labn.net> <B0B12FA2-5510-4AD4-8964-DF21B8FAD6DA@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <B0B12FA2-5510-4AD4-8964-DF21B8FAD6DA@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.203]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D1DAA351298BBaceeciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-yang-coord/ZkDLnIjb_37PTxygVMm0tXpMuT8>
Cc: "rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org" <Rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org>, YANG Doctors <yang-doctors@ietf.org>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Subject: Re: [Rtg-yang-coord] yang models intended for the mpls wg
X-BeenThere: rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"List to discuss coordination between the Routing related YANG models\"" <rtg-yang-coord.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-yang-coord>, <mailto:rtg-yang-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-yang-coord/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-yang-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-yang-coord>, <mailto:rtg-yang-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 18:48:13 -0000

Hi Mahesh,

Please comment on https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model/ as this is the latest view of the design team.

Thanks,
Acee

From: Rtg-yang-coord <rtg-yang-coord-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:rtg-yang-coord-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com<mailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com>>
Date: Sunday, July 26, 2015 at 4:31 PM
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net<mailto:lberger@labn.net>>
Cc: Routing YANG <rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org<mailto:rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org>>, YANG Doctors <yang-doctors@ietf.org<mailto:yang-doctors@ietf.org>>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu<mailto:loa@pi.nu>>
Subject: Re: [Rtg-yang-coord] yang models intended for the mpls wg

Lou,

I like the approach taken in the draft draft-openconfig-mpls-consolidated-model. In particular, the approach represented in this tree model makes sense to me.


   +--rw mpls!
         +--rw global
         |     ...
         +--rw te-global-attributes
         |     ...
         +--rw signaling-protocols
         |     ...
         +--rw lsps
               ...


However, by its own admission, the draft says:


This model does not aim to be feature complete (i.e., cover all
   possible aspects or features of MPLS).

My suggestion would be for the MPLS WG to take up the model structure as represented above and to do a more complete work of including all features of MPLS, e.g. GMPLS.

Thanks.

Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com<mailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email