IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rtg-yang-coord] Operational State Modeling

"Russ White" <russw@riw.us> Tue, 12 May 2015 21:17 UTC

Return-Path: <russw@riw.us>
X-Original-To: rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 744051A902C for <rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 May 2015 14:17:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.79
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.79 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dPTkH8sngKxF for <rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 May 2015 14:17:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server.riw.us (server.riw.us [162.144.32.236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D08A1A901D for <Rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 May 2015 14:17:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 162-229-180-77.lightspeed.rlghnc.sbcglobal.net ([162.229.180.77]:63586 helo=RussPC) by server.riw.us with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from <russw@riw.us>) id 1YsHYL-0007wV-3I; Tue, 12 May 2015 21:17:25 +0000
From: "Russ White" <russw@riw.us>
To: "'Xufeng Liu'" <xufeng.liu@ericsson.com>, <Rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org>
References: <AAB1CC9C17CBA440BDFA169056B93B9EBE8260@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <AAB1CC9C17CBA440BDFA169056B93B9EBE8260@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 17:17:22 -0400
Message-ID: <003901d08cf9$09cc8c90$1d65a5b0$@riw.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0
Thread-Index: AQHL9QK19n8XDxLtLL9w/thfSdrdSJ2CB4Wg
Content-Language: en-us
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server.riw.us
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - riw.us
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server.riw.us: authenticated_id: russw@riw.us
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-yang-coord/aa2eSRHeIg7UYAnChKlPPulbUTQ>
Subject: Re: [Rtg-yang-coord] Operational State Modeling
X-BeenThere: rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"List to discuss coordination between the Routing related YANG models\"" <rtg-yang-coord.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-yang-coord>, <mailto:rtg-yang-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-yang-coord/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-yang-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-yang-coord>, <mailto:rtg-yang-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 21:17:29 -0000

> 2.1.Option 1

This is my least preferred option, because it seems to tie the existence of
any tunnels to their configuration in some way. There may well be TE tunnels
not configured by a local process, and yet you want to be able to see their
state (?). Given this, I would prefer one of the options that separates rw
from ro more cleanly.

:-)

Russ

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email