Re: [Rtg-yang-coord] I-D Action: draft-openconfig-mpls-consolidated-model-00.txt

Josh,

see below.

On 3/16/2015 2:51 PM, Joshua George wrote:
> Hi Lou,
>
> Thanks for the note and kind words.
>
> We've been nearly exclusively focused on the content and structure of
> the draft so far, and haven't yet given a lot of thought to the
> administrative component of it.
a very reasonable approach.

> Our initial thought was to present to both mpls and teas, and then
> decide based on the feedback where to direct updates.
>
> However, we'd be grateful for any thoughts or suggestions you have on
> finding the right home for it. Please let us know.
>

It's not clear to me that there is/should be one home for the whole
scope of the draft. Parts are clearly within the scope of a single WG
(e.g., segment-routing specifics seems to belong in SPRING,
unconstrained-path and LDP seems to belong in MPLS, and
constrained-path, and RSVP seems to belong in TEAS) while the overall
structure will need a home and could fall into the scope of a few
different WGs (perhaps RTG WG, I2RS or ???). 

>From my personal perspective I think it's most important to agree on an
overall structure that allows the different WG groups to make progress
in parallel.  I suspect the right folks to contribute to such an
agreement are already on this list. 

Which working group drive's the process is a bit secondary to me, and I
think the ADs ultimately get to make that call.

Does this make sense?

(Any other opinions out there? ;-)

Thanks,
Lou
> Thanks!
>
> --josh
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:44 AM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net
> <mailto:lberger@labn.net>> wrote:
>
>     Authors,
>
>     Nice bit of work here. It has a pretty comprehensive scope and
>     touches a few wgs (mpls, teas, perhaps rtgwg...). Assuming your
>     plan is to stanardize this work, what are your thoughts / plans on
>     how you are going to break down the work into different pieces and
>     WGs?
>
>     Thanks,
>     Lou
>
>
>     --- Forwarded message ---
>     From: internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>
>     Date: March 9, 2015 6:49:56 PM
>     Subject: I-D Action: draft-openconfig-mpls-consolidated-model-00.txt
>     To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org <mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org>>
>
>
>     A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>     directories.
>
>
>            Title           : MPLS / TE Model for Service Provider Networks
>            Authors         : Joshua George
>                              Luyuan Fang
>                              Eric Osborne
>                              Rob Shakir
>             Filename        :
>     draft-openconfig-mpls-consolidated-model-00.txt
>             Pages           : 47
>             Date            : 2015-03-09
>
>     Abstract:
>       This document defines a framework for a YANG data model for
>       configuring and managing label switched paths, including the
>       signaling protocols, traffic engineering, and operational aspects
>       based on carrier and content provider operational requirements.
>
>
>     The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-openconfig-mpls-consolidated-model/
>
>     There's also a htmlized version available at:
>     http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-openconfig-mpls-consolidated-model-00
>
>
>     Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>     submission
>     until the htmlized version and diff are available at
>     tools.ietf.org <http://tools.ietf.org>.
>
>     Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>     ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     I-D-Announce mailing list
>     I-D-Announce@ietf.org <mailto:I-D-Announce@ietf.org>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
>     Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
>     or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
>
>
>
>