Re: [Rtg-yang-coord] I-D Action: draft-openconfig-mpls-consolidated-model-00.txt

[Loa Andersson <[e-mail]>]

Lou,

I take this to mean:
"Yes, we can take the discussion as suggest below in Dallas, but we also
  need a discussion on the [e-mail], possibly before,
  during and after the Dallas meeting."

I agree to that!

/Loa

On 2015-03-19 14:59, Lou Berger wrote:
>
>
> On 3/19/2015 6:04 AM, Loa Andersson wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> This of course triggered the obvious question - "What is your plan"?
>>
>> So what I'd like to to see for draft-openconfig-mpls-consolidated-model
>> discussions in Dallas is
>>
>> - that the discussion on the overall structure goes to the rtgwg
>>
>> - that the technology specific parts are discussed in the relevant
>>     working group; it see the following wg's that (should) have an
>>     interest in this
>>     - teas
>>     - mpls
>>     - spring
>>     - i2rs (?), this might be more of an interest in the overall
>>       structure.
>>
>> For mpls this discussion will take place on Friday, if we during the
>> week can agree on a plan forward, and we need time to socialize that
>> I think there are a few minutes available in the mpls meeting do that.
>
> So the general questions I see / have, which are wider than the scope of
> this draft, are:
> 1. how does the whole control plane (including te+non-te signaling and
> routing) picture fit together and relate to other/existing models?
> 2. how do all the different topology/service models fit together?
> 3. What is the commonality in the data plane models of MPLS and GMPLS
> (LSPs)?
>     (Yes this assumes that there isn't a full model per controlled
> technology.)
>
> I think different WGs are/can be involved in addressing these.  As I
> said before, I personally care more about these being discussed then
> where they are discussed.  I like your plan as it provides a place to
> catch any topics not already covered earlier in the week.
>
> In the interim, it would be good to start on the actual discussions on
> this (or whichever appropriate) list.
>
> Lou
>> /Loa
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2015-03-19 10:24, Loa Andersson wrote:
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> I have not seen any reaction to this, what is the plan?
>>>
>>> /Loa
>>>
>>> On 2015-03-18 17:45, Lou Berger wrote:
>>>> Sounds like there's a plan afoot to give rtgwg time to discuss this
>>>> thread/draft (as well as relive some of the overall time constraints. )
>>>>     My understanding is that the overall structure  &  base document will
>>>> be discussed there, while the other WG-specific information / sub-models
>>>> (e.g., LDP, RSVP, TE, SR, ...) will covered in their respective WGs.
>>>>
>>>> Alia/ADs/Authors,
>>>>
>>>> Can you confirm?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Lou
>>>>
>>>> On 3/17/2015 12:35 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
>>>>> RTGWG agenda is already jam packed - no room for any additions.
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Rtg-yang-coord mailing list
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-yang-coord
>>>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rtg-yang-coord mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-yang-coord
>

-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
Senior MPLS Expert                          [e-mail]
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: [phone]