Re: [Rtg-yang-coord] rtg-cfg hierachy (PLEASE REPLY TO THIS ONE WITH THE CORRECT MAIL ALIASES)

Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Mon, 23 February 2015 19:31 UTC

Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A88301A3BA6; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 11:31:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tPylhY1_D-Ph; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 11:31:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [83.241.162.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0276B1A1B87; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 11:31:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (host-90-237-135-209.mobileonline.telia.com [90.237.135.209]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 198A9128048E; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 20:31:48 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 20:31:40 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <20150223.203140.655664249325530031.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: lhotka@nic.cz
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2a904zti2.fsf@birdie.labs.nic.cz>
References: <14011_1423852286_54DE42FE_14011_2207_1_D103AD28.E652%acee@cisco.com> <54E47928.8050108@orange.com> <m2a904zti2.fsf@birdie.labs.nic.cz>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.5 on Emacs 24.3 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-yang-coord/jLbFX7inwSSsMleco1ZudqmGRgk>
Cc: rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org, thomas.morin@orange.com, acee@cisco.com, rtgwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Rtg-yang-coord] rtg-cfg hierachy (PLEASE REPLY TO THIS ONE WITH THE CORRECT MAIL ALIASES)
X-BeenThere: rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"List to discuss coordination between the Routing related YANG models\"" <rtg-yang-coord.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-yang-coord>, <mailto:rtg-yang-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-yang-coord/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-yang-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-yang-coord>, <mailto:rtg-yang-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 19:31:51 -0000

Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> wrote:
> Thomas Morin <thomas.morin@orange.com> writes:
> > Additionally, Lada, you say that based on my comments "in rev. -03 the 
> > list of RIBs (then called "routing-table") was the moved out of the 
> > routing instance (then called "router") and became global.". But if I 
> > look at -03, "routing-table" is still a child of "router".  The change 
> > to make "routing-table" global was made in -05.
> >
> > I guess you need to find out what was the motivation for the change in 
> > -05, a few months after my initial comments were address.
> 
> Yes, you are right, it seems the immediate motivation for this change
> was this review by Martin Bjorklund:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg06962.html

I don't really understand what exactly in this review led to that
change?


/martin