IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rtg-yang-coord] Please compile your YANG modules with pyang --ietf

Anees Shaikh <aashaikh@google.com> Thu, 02 April 2015 17:47 UTC

Return-Path: <aashaikh@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4786C1B2DAB for <rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 10:47:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id trU91hajqRZc for <rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 10:47:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22c.google.com (mail-ob0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E11771B2DA5 for <rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 10:47:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbgh1 with SMTP id gh1so132985738obb.1 for <rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org>; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 10:47:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Amiy0sWFfoUvj5zM5umFn3fbMJeNDQVLJrYQejCHkmE=; b=AlryMRp3hCRUsAW6RcU8QVW6kFTHyTMaLSWLqIxIOPZ8o7Y4fxBagj+5nyeCuGAdUt S0h5a3Vlndps4/83dDDDkNJif+AN2qh0aQ1e9r5MTS7u2aAk2TEJu8cgaYssWOvl3t8x yFZ8atD8rnrfIR8CPUODIdZ3MSbFc83aNlQJXPgTbXOYunGSyxH+BkabD4dRo+U+ebwa gHkmnjHFQ+hOX6ubGeRlLqJSBD33Llu+iiWbJiOVNWekUuNGfVQ2sdkXvqTgRc0NHGRX pDyApSbU1GwKkGGVyeYjdQbh8VViElWkWoUqvARC6NS/lUxr/gIYDn6/yAmMZefmDBAg w40A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Amiy0sWFfoUvj5zM5umFn3fbMJeNDQVLJrYQejCHkmE=; b=WK21GiuH/RGXddFiZ+iH7WL04ghJlBUUuWzGKUJfb1RoVTqcVT5Vzg621Ar6fGje0B PNok7BIEBUqLITcXLTCYuBLbuuqQIe9aZOaz9DgHQJVWHKQipCqGTnN28lmVb47uOJ33 njJzhKq/jEUcwb5NZEZnlg6j8ygTVmmJTOCUCO5EUur25rvp+DtLqxRXBX2ihDZIwb5m bH/ORE5CDYGl2pJXXPXZmsYu4zPRrxWhFvRvFKvAS9I6AxrDfAe1UX7wuQwC8ss2jLtT aqHzIOC9RJE//BN46Dg30IzNxaLv2vkHiUbPjh34QpjV9j0DjJ60E3EoTc6PLANBTfbW g5ag==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmfi/A2ZNYXJ9WbGik7QTwiV6F6ceqpG0apBp1JiKSwKiOalO7M/yE3/UGzNwmBkJ3iN6Is
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.47.104 with SMTP id c8mr14406143oen.51.1427996865265; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 10:47:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.73.137 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 10:47:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <551D519A.20600@cisco.com>
References: <551D519A.20600@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 10:47:45 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJK7Zq+VxGH7gPrON-iDG=J5ZfwDM-S+474NQxFKcGSdUm7Lpg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Anees Shaikh <aashaikh@google.com>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, "rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org" <rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c1f402e52e5a0512c16de7
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-yang-coord/mdQalWz6ScQEm8JeFjN6AFgEchw>
Subject: Re: [Rtg-yang-coord] Please compile your YANG modules with pyang --ietf
X-BeenThere: rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"List to discuss coordination between the Routing related YANG models\"" <rtg-yang-coord.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-yang-coord>, <mailto:rtg-yang-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-yang-coord/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-yang-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-yang-coord>, <mailto:rtg-yang-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 17:47:47 -0000

As you know, the --ietf flag insists on having a namespace with an ietf
prefix, i.e.:

warning: IETF rule (RFC 6087: 4.8): namespace value should be
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:XXX"

IMO this shouldn't be a requirement except of IETF published standard (or
adopted working group) models -- why do all new proposed models have to use
this namespace to be compliant with the review tools?

thanks.
-- Anees

On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 7:26 AM, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> Please compile your YANG modules with pyang --ietf, as documented at
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/ops/trac/wiki/yang-review-tools, to be
> compliant with RFC 6087.
>
> I now have a new column without the "--ietf" pyang flag. See
> http://www.claise.be/IETFYANGPageCompilation.html. This confirms that the
> "--ietf" flag is not well known to IETFers. Hence this email :-)
>
> Regards, Benoit
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rtg-yang-coord mailing list
> Rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-yang-coord
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email