Re: [Rtg-yang-coord] [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg

Hi,

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> wrote:
> We had a lot of good discussions at IETF 94 with respect to the
> ietf-routing and how it could be augmented in the future to support I2RS.
> These discussions are ongoing.
> 
> One current change that I would like to propose is to change the base
> instance container from routing-instance to networking-instance.

Is the idea to simply rename the "routing-instance" container to
"networking-instance"?

Then we would have:

   +--rw routing
      +--rw networking-instance

Would you keep the top-level name "routing"?

/martin

> This
> would provide an instance definition that could be augmented for L2
> protocols and service functionality as well as L3. It is also consistent
> with the term used in both
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model-01.txt and
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-openconfig-rtgwg-network-instance-01.txt.
> 
> Thanks,
> Acee 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> 