IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rtg-yang-coord] Floating point

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Fri, 16 January 2015 02:45 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AF571A9131 for <rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:45:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.422
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.422 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id saMG8nY7tWER for <rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:45:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 437261A90D0 for <Rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:45:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BRK06237; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 02:45:14 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.39) by lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 02:45:12 +0000
Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.169]) by nkgeml408-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.39]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 10:45:05 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
Thread-Topic: [Rtg-yang-coord] Floating point
Thread-Index: AQHQMJw/dnswT7mTbEC5MTjxCRMvO5zBIQwQ//+JxICAAV36IA==
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 02:45:04 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA846A0D2D@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <CABCOCHThwQXPYZqK_gapK4ycGfkNUrfgL_81FZU1watVm8pM=A@mail.gmail.com> <20141221213240.GA34831@elstar.local> <D0BCC95F.AC81%acee@cisco.com> <20141222.100038.719440000332847338.mbj@tail-f.com> <D0D20519.B275%acee@cisco.com> <54B061CB.2090108@cisco.com> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA8469FB63@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <54B7785D.8070309@cisco.com> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA846A0AB2@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <20150115134215.GA5890@elstar.local>
In-Reply-To: <20150115134215.GA5890@elstar.local>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.138.41.180]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-yang-coord/vlqfWA2yGNZDdEMIRp-2_LfEcO8>
Cc: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, "Rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org" <Rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Rtg-yang-coord] Floating point
X-BeenThere: rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"List to discuss coordination between the Routing related YANG models\"" <rtg-yang-coord.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-yang-coord>, <mailto:rtg-yang-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-yang-coord/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-yang-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-yang-coord>, <mailto:rtg-yang-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 02:45:19 -0000

Juergen:
I agree we should bring these issues up on the NETMOD list, I am not proposing to slow down YANG 1.1 activity, but we need to find a way to address these open issues which may be obstacles to the future yang model development.

Regards!
-Qin
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de] 
发送时间: 2015年1月15日 21:42
收件人: Qin Wu
抄送: Benoit Claise; Rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org
主题: Re: [Rtg-yang-coord] Floating point

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 01:00:57PM +0000, Qin Wu wrote:
> Thanks Benoit.
> You are right, putting tracked issues in one place is not enough, I 
> think we can use issue tracking system to create new ticket for each 
> open issue and track their status. Also we can establish connection 
> between these YANG language issues and YANG Doctors, track down the final solution, make them solved in the RFC6020bis, RFC6021bis.
>

The YANG language is maintained by the NETMOD working group and this is where discussions concerning YANG features need to take place. If people create tickets or discussions outside NETMOD, there is a good chance that NETMDO will ignore them. Also note that the NETMOD WG is following a structured process for the YANG 1.1 activity in order to try to deliver on time.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email