IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-09: (with COMMENT)

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Thu, 18 January 2018 07:37 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C179D127010; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 23:37:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6uz9L6UOMiUb; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 23:37:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8238126B6E; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 23:37:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1808; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1516261067; x=1517470667; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pN4nlOeQFgTQZp9jVqU7VpX+KuZKIzG6ipWYS65f5Zk=; b=ajP14PpA513npQyW7wCfGsVgLhfCYT5YG3n2EtsbFe4/J26Rx1AgxxG8 bo42bediRO30JIbylfY7fmz2oe0b6SpuXU6dqi5bFATpA190H8axwSuDn Ip74ah/lY7ZOxSbnKL376BwJU/HfLcZRI8Gy+NjeXAVZOQbVtueJEyrkK k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BzAQCqTWBa/xbLJq1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYQndCeDXYsYj2yXRIICCiOFGAKFKRQBAQEBAQEBAQFrKIUjAQEBBCMVQQwECxEEAQEDAiMDAgJGCQgGAQwGAgEBii8Qp1KCJ4lSAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGAWBD4cZgWgpgwWDLwEBAQEBAYE6ARIBgzaCZQWKV5kViA6NRYIZhh2Db4dujUOBYIgMgTw2ImBXEQgyGggbFYJnglQcGYFPQDcBiWaCPAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,376,1511827200"; d="scan'208";a="1461794"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Jan 2018 07:37:44 +0000
Received: from [10.55.221.36] (ams-bclaise-nitro3.cisco.com [10.55.221.36]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w0I7bihc021222; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 07:37:44 GMT
Subject: Re: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-09: (with COMMENT)
To: Xufeng Liu <Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: "draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp@ietf.org>, Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.qu@huawei.com>, "rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org" <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
References: <151566796862.24042.431976662175888091.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <BN3PR0201MB08677AB229C66C38509119A4F1E90@BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <ae47f9ad-ad2b-705f-d4a9-1de5ae8241c3@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 08:37:41 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BN3PR0201MB08677AB229C66C38509119A4F1E90@BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/-SAQmfNbIusoABUJPHr2mCKPlTc>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 07:37:49 -0000

Hi Xufeng,
> Hi Benoit and all,
>
> We used to have a full tree as Section 3, in the revision 02. We received some comment to move it to an appendix. We are fine with moving it back to the main body, if no more objections.
to be decided with your AD.

Regards, Benoit
>
> Thanks,
> - Xufeng
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Benoit Claise [mailto:bclaise@cisco.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 5:53 AM
>> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
>> Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp@ietf.org; Yingzhen Qu
>> <yingzhen.qu@huawei.com>; rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org; yingzhen.qu@huawei.com;
>> rtgwg@ietf.org
>> Subject: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-09: (with
>> COMMENT)
>>
>> Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-09: No Objection
>>
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
>> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory
>> paragraph, however.)
>>
>>
>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>
>>
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp/
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> I have to refer to an appendix to find the full tree diagram.
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-08#appendix-A, with no
>> forward reference. Why don't you have the full tree in a new section, as you did
>> in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-08#section-3
>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email