IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: WG adoption for draft-hu-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection

"chenhuan6@chinatelecom.cn" <chenhuan6@chinatelecom.cn> Fri, 21 February 2020 07:10 UTC

Return-Path: <chenhuan6@chinatelecom.cn>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06FB8120143; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 23:10:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HecKwK8LlJRT; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 23:10:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from chinatelecom.cn (prt-mail.chinatelecom.cn [42.123.76.228]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA9E5120033; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 23:10:22 -0800 (PST)
HMM_SOURCE_IP: 172.18.0.48:2259.280874355
HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000
HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: SMTP
Received: from clientip-113.119.194.86?logid-C5CA953761B7481889D40364C7BAE62C (unknown [172.18.0.48]) by chinatelecom.cn (HERMES) with SMTP id 2B9552800ED; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 15:10:15 +0800 (CST)
X-189-SAVE-TO-SEND: 44093218@chinatelecom.cn
Received: from ([172.18.0.48]) by App0024 with ESMTP id C5CA953761B7481889D40364C7BAE62C for jefftant.ietf@gmail.com; Fri Feb 21 15:10:17 2020
X-Transaction-ID: C5CA953761B7481889D40364C7BAE62C
X-filter-score: filter<0>
X-Real-From: chenhuan6@chinatelecom.cn
X-Receive-IP: 172.18.0.48
X-MEDUSA-Status: 0
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 15:10:17 +0800
From: "chenhuan6@chinatelecom.cn" <chenhuan6@chinatelecom.cn>
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>, Routing WG <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: WG adoption for draft-hu-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection
References: <57a150fb-e91b-4581-9fc0-781e77c43e59@Spark>, <c986b387-e6e8-46a7-8f4a-a3417de3776b@Spark>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.15.80[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <202002211509170933402@chinatelecom.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart452806180383_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/-fp6JMKCZ2yXWDHyahaGlX6bX8Y>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:10:28 -0000

Support. I am not aware of any relevant IPR.

BR.
HuaNan


From: Jeff Tantsura
Date: 2020-02-21 03:02
To: RTGWG; Routing WG
Subject: WG adoption for draft-hu-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection
Dear RTGWG,

The authors have requested RTGWG to adopt draft-hu-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection as the working group document.
The draft has received support during IETF106 meeting, authors have addressed all the comments received, I expect new version that addresses latest comments from Yimin to be uploaded within few days.

Please indicate support or no-support by April 5, 2020.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this
email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.
The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will not
advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each
author and each individual that has contributed to the document.

Cheers,
Jeff & Chris

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email