Re: [arch-d] APN (Application-aware Networking) Mailing List

Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Sat, 15 August 2020 16:35 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 690C73A041A; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 09:35:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.319
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.319 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hrhSwzjeyvm2; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 09:35:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-4.web-hosting.com (server217-4.web-hosting.com [198.54.116.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F21013A0402; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 09:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Mime-Version: Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=KCl8jaYLaK30vCXTSrmz/hkEwWHmxZDMSyhE83M2QGU=; b=iYGpMGsjn71mNGaLYH9y36V3P JR3VUBg2fYnj6581P562fMLFnuoGZulcYMTRea9Ei1kEKXc4ph4HUQk2CKqU2uYxmMsF/Kqlcym9B qA0AB8NpwYLzZvEJ5WZfncsIgiiLjK86kVgZ7VVY1y7kyJcDKCeWxH+3oDRFwopy7EBWujB/QWLAF E3KKS9I1CrSiGFd/tqQcE1AAVK2KLMKTMGn1sC/L7fOelWOPaPwzyjQ0ZTIgVV1Jh/0DQEwwn0GNy Ve/yFhANPFz6B56SPUuEv0woyDL/fVBPOgYIulCbWFbEpp1gh3PA4HtzhjPScwndaN8xzLeIXrqM2 rJeqSzZEw==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-225-198.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.225.198]:52653 helo=[192.168.1.14]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1k6z9f-002aGS-4u; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 12:35:43 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
Subject: Re: [arch-d] APN (Application-aware Networking) Mailing List
From: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <8E7FA3E3-21FF-4E84-8A89-B1CB2445A6AA@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 09:35:38 -0700
Cc: Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>, "architecture-discuss@ietf.org" <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>, "daniel@olddog.co.uk" <daniel@olddog.co.uk>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FDFBF122-F574-496F-9D95-9B67ED7F16FD@strayalpha.com>
References: <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D9381CC52@dggemm512-mbs.china.huawei.com> <171DEAE6-BC06-44B8-88E9-64BA20850450@strayalpha.com> <8E7FA3E3-21FF-4E84-8A89-B1CB2445A6AA@comcast.net>
To: John Day <jeanjour@comcast.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/0gtxa1rKJuBm1rzo6XZEafuMH5s>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 16:35:49 -0000

TRIGTRAN did look at signals both up and down the network stack.

(Browser to OS to disk doesn’t involve that stack)

Joe

> On Aug 14, 2020, at 8:11 PM, John Day <jeanjour@comcast.net> wrote:
> 
> No, these are the ones who think that your browser should be able to tell Windows what order to do the disk queue.
> 
> John
> 
>> On Aug 14, 2020, at 20:37, Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> wrote:
>> 
>> This WG appears to be revisiting the issues of the expired trigtran wg. It might be useful to understand why that did not succeed and whether you are asking the same question twice and expecting a different answer. 
>> 
>> Joe
>> 
>>> On Aug 12, 2020, at 9:25 PM, Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Folks,
>>> 
>>> The APN mailing list has been created. If you have interest in the work, please subscribe.
>>> 
>>> List address: apn@ietf.org
>>> Archive: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/apn
>>> To subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apn
>>> 
>>> Purpose:
>>> This email list is the discussion list for the Application-aware Networking (APN). Application-aware Networking is a mechanism whereby traffic flows can be steered and routed within the network to ensure that the specific service levels needed by applications can be delivered.  
>>> 
>>> This list belongs to IETF area: RTG
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Look forward to going on to have more discussion in the mailing list.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Best regards, 
>>> Zhenbin (Robin)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ________________________________________
>>> 发件人: Architecture-discuss [architecture-discuss-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Lizhenbin [lizhenbin@huawei.com]
>>> 发送时间: 2020年7月29日 0:17
>>> 收件人: architecture-discuss@ietf.org; rtgwg@ietf.org
>>> 抄送: daniel@olddog.co.uk
>>> 主题: [arch-d] APN (Application-aware Networking) Side Meeting
>>> 
>>> Hi All,
>>> We will have the APN side meeting at 12:30 - 14:00 UTC on July 30 (Thursday). The agenda and the WebEx information is provided in the following link.
>>> https://github.com/APN-Community/IETF108-Side-Meeting-APN
>>> 
>>> There has been several similar work like APN such as SPUD and PLUS. Recently Network Token work was also proposed. The side meeting is to try to clarify the scope of APN comparing with other work. The possible usecases are also proposed for the APN work. Another goal of the side meeting is to clarify the security and privacy issues which are always proposed against such application-ware networking work. In RTGWG session held yesterday, the presentation of APN work discussed the possible scenarios related with the security and privacy issues. The following slides is for your reference:
>>> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/108/slides/slides-108-rtgwg-8-rtgwg-apn6-01
>>> 
>>> Since it is a complex cross-area work and there is much background information, wish you could join the side meeting if you have interest in the work and your comments and suggestions are appreciated.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Daniel & Zhenbin (Robin)
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Architecture-discuss mailing list
>>> Architecture-discuss@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Architecture-discuss mailing list
>>> Architecture-discuss@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Architecture-discuss mailing list
>> Architecture-discuss@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss
>