Re: IPR Claims related to draft-ietf-rtgwg-mofrr

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Fri, 11 April 2014 13:35 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACABC1A0696 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 06:35:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.772
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.772 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 73eXs7dAUp2v for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 06:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1871D1A026C for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 06:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3431; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1397223344; x=1398432944; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=KExRzyUusRxWC/jpCMEFZ+RyCVjKlbFiZWAV5kJV5Rc=; b=ApJFli/eUU3eIRQ72bL3UOtY/y1ppA+e/MgnH3uVWMYp084p1PVtnBHs +wxuQQptMtvjt7RrNJgkJf0AqRXBKSPtT7+LWDjw2bmOf95cbklS8hQeg D/94+XToy+aEWZ/jvZDsOsdAdyw7mupY44emtO3HeC18ZJ2uKf8476fft s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqcFAC/uR1OtJV2Z/2dsb2JhbABZgkJEO1etf41ZiHSBGxZ0giYBAQR5EAIBCAQ7BzIUEQIEDgWHfA3MIheOaAQHhDgEmGCBNZENgzGCKw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.97,842,1389744000"; d="scan'208,217"; a="316995728"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 Apr 2014 13:35:43 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x12.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x12.cisco.com [173.36.12.86]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s3BDZh1N022000 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:35:43 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x15.cisco.com ([169.254.9.162]) by xhc-aln-x12.cisco.com ([173.36.12.86]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 08:35:43 -0500
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: "draft-ietf-rtgwg-mofrr@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-mofrr@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: IPR Claims related to draft-ietf-rtgwg-mofrr
Thread-Topic: IPR Claims related to draft-ietf-rtgwg-mofrr
Thread-Index: AQHPPz9L2w2bbTUN3EO+tBGO/aSUWpsMqB+A
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:35:42 +0000
Message-ID: <CF6D6705.5456B%aretana@cisco.com>
References: <CF480018.50946%aretana@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CF480018.50946%aretana@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.117.15.3]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CF6D67055456Baretanaciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/2C5PzS7yggmOXS31WAF9TqWZoYA
Cc: "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:35:48 -0000

Authors/Contributors:

So far I have only heard back from Jeff Tantsura (as a contributor), who pointed at an additional piece of IPR:  https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2332/

We must hear from all of you (yes, all 8 of you) if this draft is to progress.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

On 3/14/14 12:38 AM, "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com<mailto:aretana@cisco.com>> wrote:

Hi!

In parallel to the WGLC for this draft, I want to formally ask the authors (and contributors) to please respond to this message indicating whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR beyond what has already been disclosed.  The draft will not progress (pending the results of the WGLC) until we have received a response from each author/contributor.

http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=document_search&id=draft-ietf-rtgwg-mofrr

Thanks!

Alvaro.