Comments on draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm-06

János Farkas <janos.farkas@ericsson.com> Thu, 10 December 2015 16:24 UTC

Return-Path: <Janos.Farkas@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F16571A888F for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 08:24:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HaLOVLLgy085 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 08:24:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sesbmg22.ericsson.net (sesbmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C6B31A877D for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 08:23:32 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-f79296d00000141d-98-5669a702ad29
Received: from ESESSHC021.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.81]) by sesbmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 70.4D.05149.207A9665; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 17:23:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [159.107.143.212] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.83) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.248.2; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 17:23:13 +0100
Message-ID: <5669A6F1.5050604@ericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 17:23:13 +0100
From: János Farkas <janos.farkas@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Comments on draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm-06
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrJLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2J7oC7T8swwg67n2hat31awWVx485vZ gcljyZKfTB5fLn9mC2CK4rJJSc3JLEst0rdL4Mpo/HmcpaCZt2J+/2/mBsZzXF2MnBwSAiYS E7euZIGwxSQu3FvP1sXIxSEkcJhR4vCCNYwQzlpGib/N2xhBqngFtCXeHd3KCmKzCKhKfP/Z ywRiswk4SfQvOA02SVQgSuLokqvsEPWCEidnPgGLiwiYS/RdPs8MYjMLiEhcn/gYbI6wgJXE 3T2bGCHiFhIz55+HsuUltr+dA1YvJKAm8entQ/YJjPyzkIydhaRlFpKWBYzMqxhFi1OLk3LT jYz0Uosyk4uL8/P08lJLNjECA/Dglt8GOxhfPnc8xCjAwajEw/tBKTNMiDWxrLgy9xCjBAez kgjvlhlAId6UxMqq1KL8+KLSnNTiQ4zSHCxK4rzNTA9ChQTSE0tSs1NTC1KLYLJMHJxSDYwC TA37JeK9FjYGvPd7HzSnvDTPjN9Y6r7H8ZSOGnFxSdmMzrSvmgFabyW9c7a2qr8WV/60TvPj jP6FViG9XjI2ihdnHX389VzJpH9rH61J1DDkOh1Q5CRWY/zhKnOFXIRLG/uJaY8NJjy2/Swr dO3jJbtfK3VvsB+fz162v+bS0ntNl7OOiyixFGckGmoxFxUnAgDbEMm3PAIAAA==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/2_OaDYMmU26tQk4nJqzuJWVA1zY>
Cc: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:24:06 -0000

Hi,

Please find below some comments on the draft based on ID nits:

** The abstract seems to contain references 
([I-D.ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture]), which it shouldn't. Please 
replace those with straight textual mentions of the documents in question.
** There are 2 instances of too long lines in the document, the longest 
one being 6 characters in excess of 72.
== There are 6 instances of lines with non-RFC5735-compliant IPv4 
addresses in the document. If these are example addresses, they should 
be changed.
== Unused Reference: 'I-D.ietf-mpls-ldp-mrt' is defined on line 5298, 
but no explicit reference was found in the text
== Unused Reference: 'I-D.ietf-rtgwg-ipfrr-notvia-addresses' is defined 
on line 5309, but no explicit reference was found in the text
== Unused Reference: 'LFARevisited' is defined on line 5334, but no 
explicit reference was found in the text
== Unused Reference: 'LightweightNotVia' is defined on line 5341, but no 
explicit reference was found in the text
== Unused Reference: 'RFC3137' is defined on line 5358, but no explicit 
reference was found in the text
== Unused Reference: 'RFC5286' is defined on line 5369, but no explicit 
reference was found in the text
== Unused Reference: 'RFC5714' is defined on line 5374, but no explicit 
reference was found in the text
== Unused Reference: 'RFC6571' is defined on line 5378, but no explicit 
reference was found in the text
-- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 2327 
(Obsoleted by RFC 4566)
-- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 3137 
(Obsoleted by RFC 6987)

Best regards,
Janos