Re: AD review and progressing: draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc-10

Ariff Premji <ariff@arista.com> Mon, 23 May 2016 21:37 UTC

Return-Path: <ariff@arista.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1412512D1D9 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 May 2016 14:37:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=arista.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gitjkAka7aiF for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 May 2016 14:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22e.google.com (mail-pf0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A471012D52A for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 May 2016 14:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id c189so70290028pfb.3 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 May 2016 14:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arista.com; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Sf2b3p+JqsO++CxfetT8gg5quzfz9qyCTz1lG/CVxsM=; b=giNOmeR2ZIyAP0it0RPhyb9Aa2e8JKtiqFNbWqk4AM1reagz0BFVQFFwn76NHyR2cl l6b1Zf5gdFkZQViYuFbrjQ57p0Zl1bFKoe8NfzaESZq38+QfUTrqzvtLDKkdvSc5m+z/ bWKT5852q9IPfLenn0io6PGZ3U+CAFy15qNYA=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Sf2b3p+JqsO++CxfetT8gg5quzfz9qyCTz1lG/CVxsM=; b=Y6SnXWy9RMOi962nL7yt/4kAVd4YLXPyrUQIpNuBLSL2GSW0gpOAfcafFn0FoNptjr rckWnVHs7rg20aVRR6nErnkp5JiDwbGLoNSCD7yLGE4xp6n2uJ10cxF/DZmKx4n4msNN Hphhy9I0Quz6yG2/yVmtBB0tpj5eqXRAkHftskbomUe/yzFVSkNVAU+19l9+jgywuCGD rLUgprY8USGmuuK5kjV9gagcdajdwJJocQEzSR1Mip7SViZHCqv5oQEqodz3yiXnznj8 WnfBiB2ZfyHJB//srXw3onOs7hziSTp2p7NuSUezVGpiMuWmnqJ2KzgXDVgQwlMv8hbV lFKA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJ2shzpExhw8GBUXeVTef+nG/gQX5NMnmY97BQ+bhUx4njc7Z+fnJVMvIqxGQ8lW7Mu
X-Received: by 10.98.35.15 with SMTP id j15mr1507479pfj.108.1464039460221; Mon, 23 May 2016 14:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.105.26.24] ([167.220.58.69]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f67sm48831209pff.62.2016.05.23.14.37.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 23 May 2016 14:37:39 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Subject: Re: AD review and progressing: draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc-10
From: Ariff Premji <ariff@arista.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG4d1rcHsoVfXgHLpOryzZQUjXaCBv2UYvVqvMg6pm_0Xk27=A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 14:37:38 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <43BE42E6-DAA2-4607-8180-79E6BF1D06CC@arista.com>
References: <CAG4d1rcHsoVfXgHLpOryzZQUjXaCBv2UYvVqvMg6pm_0Xk27=A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/42KMjqmasJtx3pEILECeySq5Ylo>
Cc: "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 21:37:42 -0000

Thank you Alia and the entire RTGWG team for the support.

> On May 23, 2016, at 2:33 PM, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> First, I would like to thank Jon, Petr, and Ariff for their work on this document.  I think it will be very useful for many who are looking at data-center designs.
> 
> Second, I'd like to thank RTGWG for adopting this draft and working to improve it.  I think it is a better document than it would have been if I had instead AD-sponsored it.
> 
> Finally, I've done my AD review and have no significant comments that require addressing.  I am forwarding this draft for IETF Last Call and it is on the telechat for June 16.  I do apologize for the delay; I am a bit backlogged on drafts.
> 
> One minor suggestion is that in Section 8.3, it might be useful to refer to RFC 5837, which, if implemented, would allow a way to indicate the local interface an ICMP message was received on while doing IP address masquerading.   I believe it would solve the issue of "hiding the address of the entry point into the device".
> 
> Thanks,
> Alia
> 
>