Re: The RTGWG WG has placed draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

----- Original Message -----
From: "Aseem Choudhary (asechoud)" <asechoud@cisco.com>
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2019 9:42 PM
> Hi Tom, Jeff,
>
> We will be working on it before IETF105.

That is good.  As I said, what I really would like is reference
statements in the YANG module, but while you are at it, you might
consider

s.1 needs a reference for YANG 1.1 i,e, RFC7950

s.2 is the old boilerplate which lacks RFC8174

RFC8343 needs to be a Normative reference for the I-D

RFC7223 is obsoleted by RFC8343

YANG guidelines says that RFC8340 should be a Informative Reference

When you add the Security boilerplate, you will need some more
references for that, ditto IANA Considerations

Tom Petch

>
> -thanks,
> Aseem
>
> From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
> Date: Friday, June 21, 2019 at 1:40 PM
> To: "rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org" <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>,
"draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model@ietf.org"
<draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model@ietf.org>, "rtgwg@ietf.org"
<rtgwg@ietf.org>, tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>
> Subject: Re: The RTGWG WG has placed draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model in
state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
> Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org>
> Resent-To: <asechoud@cisco.com>, <mjethanandani@gmail.com>,
<nstrahle@juniper.net>, <exa@dscp.org>, <ing-wher_chen@jabil.com>
> Resent-Date: Friday, June 21, 2019 at 1:39 PM
>
> Tom,
>
> Thanks for your comments!
> Co-authors - please work on these, I’d also expect you to have them
incorporated in the version to be presented at IETF105.
>
> Cheers,
> Jeff
> On Jun 21, 2019, 9:50 AM -0700, tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>,
wrote:
>
> The challenge I have in reviewing this I-D is the lack of references
in
> the YANG modules for the objects and actions defined therein. I like
to
> have references since they tell me how much I should expect to
> understand, how familiar I should be with the material.
>
> Here we now have references for the YANG import statements (which is
> good) but we should also have references for many of the YANG
> statements; look for example at
> draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang-15
> for an I-D with a comprehensive list of references in the YANG module.
>
> It may be that here RFC 2697, RFC 2698, RFC3289 are all I need to know
> but I would like to be told that before I start looking into the YANG.
>
> Tom Petch
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "IETF Secretariat" <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2019 2:01 AM
>
>
> The RTGWG WG has placed draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model in state
> Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Jeff Tantsura)
>
> The document is available at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model/
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> rtgwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>
>