Re: Comments on draft-shaikh-rtgwg-policy-model

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Mon, 27 July 2015 21:30 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC9F1A0250 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:30:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mpJbX8XWQ8KH for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:30:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE4E51A00C3 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:29:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=950; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1438032600; x=1439242200; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=qnhjFjE8MTBLOxYJR0/2D/OsD4yflSp87yUHk+Nn/Fk=; b=Pif1hl46Jv6RpJVpLP0UJXEe5O4itJhnSHRlXvhVaG/vejSTTEjhTF2Y zN5eMmniAu63/B+tETSwf16kmkraysD8rmfTAY9UYg78p4TfOpeHOTMwy A0K8YjxYDZKuUMjY4NMFesye0xdBVYmlISs1gtKBNfkKx5EVM/l0cvLfB 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BFAwAxorZV/4UNJK1bgxWBPQaDHbh4CYdwAhyBLTgUAQEBAQEBAYEKhCMBAQEDASMRRQULAgEIGAICJgICAjAVEAIEDgWIJgi6eJYbAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBF4EiiiyEVDMHgmkvgRQBBJRpAYxAmSYmg31vgUiBBAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,557,1432598400"; d="scan'208";a="172856463"
Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Jul 2015 21:29:59 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com [173.37.183.84]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t6RLTxPj008519 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 27 Jul 2015 21:29:59 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.37]) by xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([173.37.183.84]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 16:29:59 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Antoni Przygienda <antoni.przygienda@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: Comments on draft-shaikh-rtgwg-policy-model
Thread-Topic: Comments on draft-shaikh-rtgwg-policy-model
Thread-Index: AdDC3mGR5ZGZB0pXRXeVs9QL62qf/AALUpaAAAEy9oAAAM0xAAACmoeAAAA5XwAAAN6fAAAyTxMAAALgagAABYCcgAAbTT2AAABCKoAAAVj2AAAJQNaAAKHL3YAAYDg4gAAEDKwAAAL6MoAAAmcfgAACafMA
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 21:29:58 +0000
Message-ID: <8E4EC148-C50A-4D33-A7AD-AFCAF4B8004F@cisco.com>
References: <etPan.55ae5784.52673c74.36f@corretto.local> <23963_1437493971_55AE6AD3_23963_745_1_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF92166A33EC@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <etPan.55ae8fbf.2ac767e3.36f@corretto.local> <18774_1437550328_55AF46F8_18774_5612_26_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF92166A3667@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <20150722073931.GB30425@puck.nether.net> <etPan.55af51be.69dfac96.36f@corretto.local> <9439_1437568985_55AF8FD9_9439_5180_1_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF92166A398C@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <D1D97D09.29830%acee@cisco.com> <20150727155051.GF24197@pfrc.org> <7A2D9D5A-CCAF-4C8B-B2BC-C8DC1F05F5AF@cisco.com> <20150727191203.GA16809@pfrc.org> <2E4BB27CAB87BF43B4207C0E55860F180EA898A4@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <2E4BB27CAB87BF43B4207C0E55860F180EA898A4@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.204]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <67F3513213228546A6C90754E2A0B5EC@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/5lpqf6kIschAfJg6n3l4jbmFTGg>
Cc: "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 21:30:01 -0000

Hey Tony, 

> On Jul 27, 2015, at 4:20 PM, Antoni Przygienda <antoni.przygienda@ericsson.com>; wrote:
> 
>> That's really where we're heading with regard to this model.  While BGP is
>> obviously the first target, this is also the beginnings of a fundamental policy
>> algebra that multiple protocols may share.
>> 
> [Tony saiz:] 
> 
> Interesting, we're bringing RPSL back ?

The model has “call” but is not fully procedural. More like a route-map with nesting. 

> And if so, providers are willing to share their policies finally ;-)  ? 

This is not required - they only need to make sure their polices map to the model. 

Thanks,
Acee 



> 
> -- Tony 
>