Re: 答复: 答复: Soliciting WG feedback and comments on draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment-00

[Stewart Bryant <[e-mail]>]

Please note Cisco declared IPR on RFC 5715 section 6.1

- Stewart

On 22/10/2013 10:20, Mike Shand wrote:
> So you have described the difference with OFIB (RFC 6976), but how 
> does your proposal differ from "incremental cost advertisement" as 
> described in RFC 5715 section 6.1?
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> On 22/10/2013 04:39, Yangang wrote:
>> OK, I got it.
>>
>> Actually, we pay attention to two point:
>>
>> 1. Which method will be more nicety? In RFC6976, all devices in 
>> network need calculate the schedule time, base on the different 
>> hardware and environment, we worry about its effect. In our draft, 
>> only failure point adjust the cost, the other device just response 
>> the cost change. I think the effect of this kind of difference will 
>> be less.
>>
>> 2. Due to no new extension, maybe the distribution will be more 
>> smoothly.
>>
>> -----邮件原件-----
>> 发件人: Acee Lindem [mailto:[e-mail]]
>> 发送时间: 2013年10月22日 9:42
>> 收件人: Yangang
>> 抄送: [e-mail]; Zhangxudong (zhangxudong, VRP)
>> 主题: Re: 答复: Soliciting WG feedback and comments on 
>> draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment-00
>>
>> I'm aware of the basic premise of the two drafts and was not asking 
>> for you to restate the obvious. Specifically, what are the benefits 
>> and determents of your draft when compared to RFC 6976?
>> Acee
>>
>> On Oct 21, 2013, at 9:30 PM, Yangang wrote:
>>
>>> Our draft is similar with section 6.1 in RFC5715, the cost of 
>>> changed link will be adjusted and advertised, maybe more than one 
>>> time, this sequence will base on some pre-calculations. But in RFC 
>>> 6976, each device should calculate the distance with the failue 
>>> link, base on this distance, each device decide when the FIB will be 
>>> updated.
>>>
>>> -----邮件原件-----
>>> 发件人: Acee Lindem [mailto:[e-mail]]
>>> 发送时间: 2013年10月21日 10:07
>>> 收件人: Yangang
>>> 抄送: [e-mail]; Zhangxudong (zhangxudong, VRP)
>>> 主题: Re: Soliciting WG feedback and comments on 
>>> draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment-00
>>>
>>> Can you contrast this with RFC 6976? You include RFC 6976 in the 
>>> Normative References but it is never referenced (this will show up 
>>> if you run idnits).
>>> Acee
>>> On Oct 20, 2013, at 9:49 PM, Yangang wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi:
>>>>
>>>> We had submitted the a new draft: 
>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment-00, 
>>>> we want to discuss the micro-loop problem through another method. 
>>>> Your feedback and comments on the rtgwg mailing list are appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Rahul.Yan
>>>>
>>>> -----邮件原件-----
>>>> 发件人: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]]
>>>> 发送时间: 2013年10月18日 15:47
>>>> 收件人: Zhangxudong (zhangxudong, VRP); Yangang
>>>> 主题: New Version Notification for 
>>>> draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment-00.txt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A new version of I-D, draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment-00.txt
>>>> has been successfully submitted by Xudong Zhang and posted to the
>>>> IETF repository.
>>>>
>>>> Filename:     draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment
>>>> Revision:     00
>>>> Title:         Algorithm for Ordered Metric Adjustment
>>>> Creation date:     2013-10-18
>>>> Group:         Individual Submission
>>>> Number of pages: 10
>>>> URL: 
>>>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment-00.txt
>>>> Status: 
>>>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment
>>>> Htmlized: 
>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zxd-rtgwg-ordered-metric-adjustment-00 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Abstract:
>>>>   Upon link down event or link up event, each device in network
>>>>   individually schedules route calculation.  Because of different
>>>>   hardware capabilities and internal/external environments, the 
>>>> time to
>>>>   update forwarding entries on these devices are disordered which can
>>>>   cause a transient forwarding loop.  This document introduces a 
>>>> method
>>>>   to prevent forwarding loop by adjusting link metric gradually for
>>>>   several times.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of 
>>>> submission
>>>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>>>
>>>> The IETF Secretariat
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> rtgwg mailing list
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtgwg mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg


-- 
For corporate legal information go to:

http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html